By Jeremy Hsu on September 24, 2024


Popular smart TV models made by Samsung and LG can take multiple snapshots of what you are watching every second – even when they are being used as external displays for your laptop or video game console.

Smart TV manufacturers use these frequent screenshots, as well as audio recordings, in their automatic content recognition systems, which track viewing habits in order to target people with specific advertising. But researchers showed this tracking by some of the world’s most popular smart TV brands – Samsung TVs can take screenshots every 500 milliseconds and LG TVs every 10 milliseconds – can occur when people least expect it.

“When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,” says Yash Vekaria at the University of California, Davis. Samsung and LG did not respond to a request for comment.

Vekaria and his colleagues connected smart TVs from Samsung and LG to their own computer server. Their server, which was equipped with software for analysing network traffic, acted as a middleman to see what visual snapshots or audio data the TVs were uploading.

They found the smart TVs did not appear to upload any screenshots or audio data when streaming from Netflix or other third-party apps, mirroring YouTube content streamed on a separate phone or laptop or when sitting idle. But the smart TVs did upload snapshots when showing broadcasts from the TV antenna or content from an HDMI-connected device.

The researchers also discovered country-specific differences when users streamed the free ad-supported TV channel provided by Samsung or LG platforms. Such user activities were uploaded when the TV was operating in the US but not in the UK.

By recording user activity even when it’s coming from connected laptops, smart TVs might capture sensitive data, says Vekaria. For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

Customers can opt out of such tracking for Samsung and LG TVs. But the process requires customers to either enable or disable between six and 11 different options in the TV settings.

“This is the sort of privacy-intrusive technology that should require people to opt into sharing their data with clear language explaining exactly what they’re agreeing to, not baked into initial setup agreements that people tend to speed through,” says Thorin Klosowski at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital privacy non-profit based in California.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2449198-smart-tvs-take-snapshots-of-what-you-watch-multiple-times-per-second/ (paywall!!)

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    5 days ago

    Imagine the amount of bandwidth and energy saved, if they didn’t do any of this bullshit.

    They are essentially using someone else’s money to get themselves more money. Fuck these people!

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    344
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    LOL “if it was opt-in, no one would do it!”

    no fucking shit. there is nothing worth watching that i would buy a smart tv for

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      One issue that has come up recently in discussions on here is that it’s hard to get dumb TVs or computer monitors in large format in 2024.

      Not impossible, but surprisingly difficult. I went looking for a large computer monitor for some user who wanted a large one. I eventually found an older one on Amazon still for sale, but it’s not that easy to get large computer monitors, which I think is part of what drives people to use smart TVs as computer monitors.

      You can get projectors, but that’s not what everyone’s after.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        A smart tv without an internet connection is usually close enough to a dumb TV. It’s not like your TV needs regular security updates so leaving it off your home network is fine.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I do not know how true it is, but I’ve heard that some of them will create a mesh network if your neighbor has the same brand and it’s connected to the internet.

          I’ve always meant to look into it but I have big dumb TVs that work for now.

            • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              6 days ago

              There’s another reply further down that goes into specifics. I ain’t the one because I didn’t come with receipts and I’m just a drunk.

          • flappy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s called wardriving, a practise Samsung TVs are infamous for.

            • Blaster M@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              To me, Wardriving is back in the day when you used to drive around town with a laptop and a program that catalogues all the open wifi networks in range.

            • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              I never put that together with wardriving but that’s exactly what it is. Thank you for that.

              Unrelated story: ~20 years ago I was in the military and broke as hell. I went wardriving in my neighborhood looking for open wifi and found a business not too far away that had it. So I built an antenna out of a coffee can, mounted it up just outside my window, and got free wifi for months.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          As mentioned by others, they sometimes network with nearby devices such as your neigbor’s TV or an unsecured wifi.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      6 days ago

      if it was opt-in, no one would do it!

      Which should be telling them that not only does no one want it, but maybe just maybe we already paid for your fucking TV. Either raise the price or stop being so fucking goddamn greedy to the point that you force us to make the government force you to stop.

      Of course the bought and paid for US government won’t, but hopefully EU governments will.

  • Slovene@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    THIS is piracy. Along with all the other personal data selling.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    237
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    These are criminal violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Jail the motherfucking felon CEOs!

    • billbasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      So LG and Samsung likely have tons of illegal (copyright) content on their servers then? Ownership is 9/10ths of the law so they say. That’s gotta be exabytes

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Most likely yes… And other privacy sensitive information like banking details, passwords and more.

  • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    6 days ago

    For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

    Don’t mind baby products and dildos or whatever.

    They could see bank activity and even login credentials when someone is temporarily displaying their own passwords.

    This basically ignores all security measures regarding everything. Sensitive communication, company secrets and so on.

    That’s fucking seriously huge. What the fuck?!

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    ·
    6 days ago

    awful ethics aside what a disgusting waste of processing power. software already barely runs

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    6 days ago

    Actual paper here.

    https://arxiv.org/html/2409.06203v1

    It is not sending full screenshots as anybody technical would already have guessed. It’s a few KB over an hour, so it’s content recognition hashes.

    Opt out anyway. Their study shows the opt out option does indeed opt you out of it.

  • Branny@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not if you never connect your smart TV to the internet to complete the setup and instead use it as a dumb display (I hope)

  • Zementid@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    Theoretically I could display highly illegal stuff and they would distribute it making them complicit?

    Can the API be hacked to flood their servers with petabytes of cat pictures?

    What is happening with the data? Where are the data savers?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    You hear that? It’s a whisper… It’s a multinational multibillion dollar class action lawsuit coming after Samsung and LG. WTF!

  • SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    So they are allowed to pirate content actually? Even if it’s not Netflix or YouTube they take screenshots of potentially copyrighted content

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Don’t let your TV connect to the internet. I have mine on my wifi so I can control them using Home Assistant, but they’re on an isolated VLAN with no internet access.

    Edit: Of course, this only works if you use an external box for streaming, like an Nvidia Shield, Apple TV, Google Chromecast TV or whatever they call it now, etc.