• 157 Posts
  • 3.85K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • There was that cat in the news a few years back who drove off that dog that was attacking and dragging a little boy in that family.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEa6jZv-Khc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSG_wBiTEE8

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara_(cat)

    On May 13, 2014, Jeremy Triantafilo, a four-year-old boy, was riding his bicycle in his family’s driveway in Bakersfield, California when Scrappy, a neighbor’s eight-month-old Labrador-Chow mix cross, came from behind and bit his leg.[9] As the dog began dragging Jeremy down his driveway, Tara, who the family states was very attached to Jeremy, tackled the dog and chased him away before returning to Jeremy’s side to check on him.

    Jeremy needed ten stitches in his left calf following the attack. He quickly recovered and was thankful for Tara’s actions calling her “my hero”.[10]

    If mean, if I were a cat – smaller than the dog in question, and physically less-able to take on larger animals than a dog anyway – and the dog was already doing a number on a human, that’s not a fight I’d casually jump into. And while there are a few social cat species, like lions, I don’t think that the wildcat ancestor of the housecat is a social animal, so it’s probably not really geared up to be helping out other members of a pride or anything.

    kagis

    Yeah, it’s solitary:

    https://synapsida.blogspot.com/2020/03/small-cats-domestic-cats-closest.html

    Among these three species, the one thought to be closest of all to the domestic animal is the sand cat (Felis margarita). This split off from the line leading to the wildcats and the Chinese mountain cat around 2.5 million years ago, just before the Ice Ages got going, while the other species (or their immediate ancestors) seem to have been around since the Late Pliocene 3 to 3.5 million years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_cat

    The sand cat is solitary, except during the mating season and when a female has kittens.



  • Honestly, given a canine’s physical capabilities, I’m not sure that I could have done as well as she did in that situation.

    And for a dog, what had to have gone into that…

    • Assess that her owner was in trouble.

    • Assess that another human could help. I’m not sure that that’s an obvious conclusion for a dog to come to from an evolutionary standpoint. My guess is that most cases, in a pack of wild dogs, for most problems short of being attacked by something, there’s not a whole lot that bringing another dog to help is going to do, if one gets hurt.

    • She had to plan out in advance a way to get a human to do what she needed them to do.

    • Assess that disrupting traffic would be a way to get attention. That is, she had to have a model of the mental state of other humans sufficient to predict how they’d act in a situation that I doubt that she’d seen before.

    • Evade capture when someone tried to capture her.

    • And keep them interested enough to follow her to the cabin.











  • IIRC from reading an few earlier articles, the limiting factor is that Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities are underground and can potentially only be penetrated with very large weapons. According to what I read, Israel apparently doesn’t have conventional weapons that can penetrate, which would mean that the US, with heavier bombers, would have to do the strike (and Biden said that he didn’t support hitting the nuclear facilities).

    That being said, I haven’t seen anything about using multiple weapons to impact the same spot, and I’m suspicious that with the accuracy of weapons today, it may be possible to just repeatedly hit a single spot and break through.

    EDIT:

    https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-not-able-to-take-down-iran-nuclear-sites-own-2024-10

    https://archive.ph/nk1KB#selection-2009.126-2017.96

    “Israel can damage Iran’s nuclear program without US assistance, but it is unclear if it can by itself carry out the type of sustained and penetrating conventional attack that would seriously set back the program,” Farzan Sabet, senior research associate at the Geneva Graduate Institute, told Business Insider.

    And I guess that it’s not impossible that Israel could have – knowing that Iran has underground facilities – built something that they’ve kept quiet specifically aimed at penetration.

    I don’t know how hard building a tandem-charge weapon is, but Israel has produced the tandem-charge Spike, and I imagine that they could have some kind of heavier tandem-charge weapon that they’ve quietly tucked away for this sort of situation.






  • Nothing but hand-waiving for our Haitian neighbors who would actually benefit from that “stabilizing” presence

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/14/what-is-the-history-of-foreign-interventions-in-haiti

    Since the early 1900s, there have been at least three direct interventions in Haiti, including a decades-long occupation by US forces.

    Given its pockmarked history of Haitian intervention, the US has expressed wariness towards leading a new international mission to Haiti. Many are calling for solutions to be Haitian-led, instead of foreign-led.

    “We need to give the Haitians time and space to get this right,” former US special envoy to Haiti, Daniel Foote, said in a recent interview with NPR.

    “Let’s let the Haitians have a chance to mess up Haiti for once. The international community has messed it up beyond recognition countless times. I guarantee the Haitians mess it up less than the Americans,” he added.



  • while Russia is only 10-20% or so.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hikes-national-defence-spending-by-23-2025-2024-09-30/

    Russia hikes 2025 defence spending by 25% to a new post-Soviet high

    Russia to spend 6.3% of GDP on national defence

    Defence spending at $145 billion, budget shows

    I mean, Russia has a benefit going away in the form of the Soviet weapons inventory, but we sent something like $62 billion to Ukraine in 2024. IIRC US-originating aid is on the order of half of what Ukraine got. Note that not all of this is grants, either…on the EU side, I believe that a considerable amount is loans on generous terms. I don’t know whether those might be forgiven or something, whether doing it as a “loan” might be to help make it more-palatable to EU voters, but point is, it may be less than the up-front number. Also, a lot of US aid is in military aid, which may not be in a form as ideal to Ukraine as simply cash; cash could be used to purchase anything, which may-or-may-not be exactly the military hardware that’s provided. Russia’s getting cash that can be used to purchase whatever (well, okay, within the constraints imposed by sanctions).

    But my broader point is, if Russia’s putting more resources into the conflict, we may well need to be willing to counter that.

    Also, keep in mind that some of those funds need to go to things like dealing with economic impact. Russia mostly has electrical power. Ukraine has lost something like 80% of their electrical output. That shuts down some of what Ukraine could be doing. If Ukraine cannot build something they need because an industry lacks electricity, then they need to import it, and that requires funds. Like, we can send a shit-ton of small generators and fuel to help offset that, but that costs something.

    And that a fair amount of what Ukraine is doing is air defense, and at least as things stand – a point that I saw just raised with the Israel/Iran missile issue – it’s generally cheaper to build something to throw something that explodes at the other guy than it is to build something that stops it before it hits.


  • considers

    If it gets a federal subsidy, that subsidy is going to really primarily benefit Pennsylvania, yes?

    I mean, yes, power from it maybe – if Microsoft isn’t schlorping all of it up – help support the grid in the region a bit. But if Microsoft’s building a datacenter in Pennsylvania and this is subsidizing a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania, the benefit’s really principally going to Pennsylvania alone, other than in the limited sense that it reduces carbon dioxide emissions.

    California or Nevada, say, isn’t going to benefit from that either way.

    Like, if there’s some sort of federal subsidy accessible to any state that wants to do nuclear power build-out and that this is just how Pennsylvania chooses to make use of it, that might be one thing.