• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Conservative be like: “NOOOO WE CANT ‘WASTE MONEY’ AND FUND A COUNTRY DEFENDING ITSELF FROM INVASION 😡😡😡”

    Also conservatives: “Lets cut social security and give money to israel so they can commit a genocide 😏”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As a point of clarity. Trump demanded a ridiculous share of minerals from Ukraine. Zelensky wanted to negotiate that. Trump essentially told him there was no negotiation. They could give up half of their future mineral wealth or they could kick rocks.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m sure Germany, France, or the UK would love to get the mineral rights that Trump is after.

    I really want this to blow up in Trump’s face. Rude strongarm tactics is a real bad look.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I sure as hell hope we don’t make our support contingent on securing mineral rights from Ukraine while they’re over a barrel.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    i need something to bring my blood pressure down. i am flushed with anger. make your own mirror of this if you download yt-dlp run from command line

    yt-dlp https://youtu.be/uqOOOR7Kr-s

    “this is gonna be great television, i’ll tell you that” - Donald Trump, 025/28/2, he tried to bully Ukrainian president Zelenskyy on live tv

    edit should be noted the minerals in ukraine are presumed, theoretical, just what little i know, but this “deal” would allow more U.S. corruption and private interests to head over and start raping the land, looking for a jackpot.

      • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        look you gotta say the date biggest to smallest. that way it’s impervious to nationalist math confusion.

        if i did it wrong then we’ll just rewrite the rules in my favor

  • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Zelensky is the strongest man in the world to be able to hold himself back from attacking these ass holes.

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think he should call Trump’s bluff and send in a few dozen battle hardened Ukrainian troops with a few dozen drones and show Trump’s entire nursing home and support staff how things work nowadays. We need to put together an anonymous block chain fund with the purpose of putting multi million bounties on the treason party, funded anonymously by small donors and build a reliable mechanism for people to anonymously, but truthfully claim the bounties. What our political contributions fail to do, crowd funding can do. All of the technology exists to make this happen, and it’s one of the main appeals of crypto currencies. Large scale anonymous transactions. If I find out there’s a billionaire Trump donating traitor or heritage foundation member near me, and I can get a basic Intel file and there’s a 500K bounty on them, then shit. They better hug their money goodnight one last time. Just send an email from a burner/anon account to a recipient with the time of death rough location and wallet address before any news is released. If all the details add up then release the funds to the wallet.

      Make it worth while and let rule#3 take effect:

      “Number three, never trust nobody Your moms’ll set that ass up, properly gassed up Hoodied and masked up, shit, for that fast buck She be laying in the bushes to light that ass up”

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean, it would have certainly resulted in him being shot on the spot. The Secret Service would shoot anyone .

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If you’re imagining some kind of first strike situation I think you’re barking up the ring tree. However, the US is extremely vulnerable economically.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          US didn’t spent most of it’s money on army for nothing. Doesn’t matter if the army is as powerful as it says it is, the image is strong enough, so nobody will dare.
          The only way it will crumble down is if they do “putin gambit”, really attack someone, fail spectacularly at it, expose inability to do shit, and get 50 square kilometres of baren wasteland for it.

  • Kaput@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Watched it, my takes: Trump is definitly the lets make an offer he can’t refuse type of negociator. I am thinking that the last week’s visits have been hard on their ego. I suspect there is an agreement between european leaders to not let them get away with lies and bullshit when in person, even in the oval office. And it seems to be working, Vance respect comment make them look real fricking weak.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The “respect” and “you should be thankful” comments reminded me of that old (I think Tumblr) post:

      Sometimes people use “respect” to mean “treating someone like a person” and sometimes they use “respect” to mean “treating someone like an authority”.

      and sometimes people who are used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me, I won’t respect you” and they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority, I won’t treat you like a person.”

      and they think they’re being fair, but they aren’t, and it’s not okay.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The respect comment took me back to his donut debacle. The couchfucker is a charisma void.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Man, I want this war over and the US out of it.

    But watching our POTUS and VP behave that way on international TV. Even if you support their politics, it’s hard for me to understand how all of us are not embarrassed.

    I also like that Zelensky didn’t just swallow the insults and spoke his piece, because the media is (of course) focusing solely on the preferred Trump narrative.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Starmer’s visit was pointless Zelensky’s visit was pointless

    stop trying to appeal to the better nature of monsters.

    Close the book on US/EU relations, NATO is dead. America is controlled by the Russian Mafia now.

    Europe, prepare for war. America, prepare for the dominion of Fasicsm, and civil war

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Before completely cutting off ties from the US showing the public attempts had been made for diplomacy and providing evidence of what a bad actor US has become is important.

      Showing is way more impactful and supports moves made afterwards than just making claims and cutting ties.

      So not completely pointless, since the public needs to be able to come to the conclusion themselves first before drastic foreign relation changes can be made.

    • zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not necessarily monsters (actually yeah they are), but he has a 40 year history of being compromised and owned by Soviet and Russian oligarchs. I’m reading “American Kompromat” now and it couldn’t be clearer. It’s not even hidden or anything. The Russians really just, won the Cold War. They did it, they toppled the US. Good job for them.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The Russian Mafia won the war,

        the nation itself is fucked. regardless of what happens. they’ve been doomed for a while.

        • zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If your definition of the Russian Mafia includes, the Kremlin, then yes. Putin and co are absolutely gangster scum that work hand in hand with the actual mafia and international criminal organizations. Sure the actual people of Russia are fucked (just as with any country of a dictator).

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            the russian federation is just a medieval imperial entity masquerading as a federated state. And its society is just a totem pole of people getting used as assets and cattle

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJgr-0t-RPc this more describes the political totem pole within the country,

            but demographically, the country is a totem pole too. Moscow and St Petersburg rule the rest of the country like bandit kings.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How is NATO dead, just because the US is no longer reliable the rest of the countries can still respond

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        NATO was a tool of American influence. Just as the Warsaw pact was a tool of Russian influence.

        The trans-atlantic partnership is over. NATO is obsolete, a successor is needed. America has checked out,

        • Y|yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          NATO was that, but it may very well continue on as something else. Without the US mind you, but nothing says the rest of the NATO countries can’t just decide to stay in.

          Of course it might also be a good time for them to all make the international equivalent of the No Homer’s Club. Either way.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Nato is not dead just because the US leaves it. The EU wasn’t dead either after the UK left.

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 hours ago

            the US and Hungary have no reason to officially leave NATO because they can sabotage it from within and use it to blackmail and steer Europe into the position they want, being puppets of Russia and US.

            the last thing America wants is a detatched Europe that isnt allied with them, they see independent Europe as a hostile entity, they are only interested in Europe being vassal states.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I wasn’t convinced at first that NATO is dead on Trump’s first term. But here we are and it is a long time coming.

          Some analysts think that the unipolar world is over, and that we’re heading into a multipolar world again but dominated by regional blocs. The EU is definitely there, and sometime later the African Union will become more cohesive and globally influential. But I don’t see Latin America having as strong regional grouping as the EU. In Asia, we can forget it because Asians tend to be insular. There is ASEAN but they do not have the same solidarity as the EU.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You forgot to mention China. Unless the EU gets its shit together and resists the same forces that are destroying the US, China is going to become that unipole.

        • rational_lib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For one why limit it to the North Atlantic? Japan, South Korea, and Australia should get in on the action too. And France and the UK can help them all get nukes (yes I mean that seriously - US and Russia being the only large nuclear powers is a disaster). Now would be a great time for the stable democracies (not the US) to create a new alliance.

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            South Korea and particularly Japan doesn’t need help getting nukes. Japan in particular has never been afraid of showing an advanced space program(for icbm technology) and their immense plutonium stockpile. They could assemble ICBMs that could target anywhere in the world in a matter of weeks.

            • Y|yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Yeah, but if they can do it that fast on their own, imagine how much faster they can get it done with help.

              Besides, if China starts getting a little froggy Japan and South Korea are going to need a lot more than a few armaments to ward them off.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Under Putin’s Sock Puppet, most certainly. However, the US MIC might hold the key to bring the USA back to being the USA.

    • Luca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A united EU against today russia? Doubt will last weeks. But we are too afraid.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fuck the MAGA US. Kick them out of NATO, and let’s arm Europe. Between France and the UK we are a nuclear power of our own.

  • uraniumcovid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    fuck you america for voting for this fascist scumbag. nobody should trust you again.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m an American and I’m upvoting this. After 2016, I thought that there were some misguided people who didn’t realize what they were doing, but that the first Trump term would push the pendulum hard the other direction. I felt a little validated when Biden won in 2020, but it wasn’t as one sided as I’d hoped. But Trump winning decisively in 2024 tells me that everyone knew and did it anyway. People are getting what they want: rampant racism, sexism, and global bullying.

      So yes, we suck, and no one should trust us as a country, regardless of the fact that there are many of us who knew how catastrophic another Trump term would be.

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t think Trump won quite as decisively as it first seemed.

        But shit, it’s still like… a third of our country that looked at Trump and went, “yeah sure”.

        How the fuck do we fix this? I straight up have no clue. And that means it very likely will devolve into violence. And that is legitimately terrifying.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 hours ago

          How the fuck do we fix this?

          The primary issue is twofold:

          1. Heavily biased information and restrictive media diets
          2. Democrat Inaction

          If you try viewing even a tiny amount of right leaning content on a fresh social media account on any platform, you’ll see the type of content that gets perpetuated. People simply become indoctrinated by content recommendations that are practically incapable of showing the other side, not to mention that most mainstream media is entirely corporately captured.

          The fact that the Democrats were slow to release official policy for Harris’s campaign, indeterminate on Gaza, and had (or really, still have) a very “this is fine, you’re just overreacting, but sure we’ll fix a few things” attitude towards political messaging, only helped Republicans, because it led a lot of people to just vote for the party that promised the most, and that was the Republicans. All the wars would be over, things would be cheaper, all the “bad” people wouldn’t be here anymore, etc.

          To a normal person with very little media literacy, those promises sound downright amazing.

          I personally think we fix this by at least starting with messaging, since that’s what actually leads most people to make a decision on who to vote for. There were literally people deciding on election night who they wanted to vote for, so messaging is highly important.

          The left needs to speak to the immediately visible, material needs of the working people directly. While it’s important to fight against the right on culture war issues to prevent the ceding of ground on things like civil rights and discrimination, I think a lot of left leaning messaging focuses too heavily on that, and as a result, it can seem to right-inclined people that the left has no economic policy. That needs to change.

          See: Bernie Sanders, and how he very consistently addresses specific economic issues people face, and has broader support on the right compared to any democratic congressperson. Hell, even JD Vance said Bernie was one of the people he least disliked on the left, and Bernie’s further left than the Democrats. Populist, economic disparity focused, anti-billionaire, pro-worker sentiment is how you change ordinary people’s minds in the current media economy.

          As an individual, the most you’ll likely be able to do in this respect is going to be volunteering for phone banking efforts, donating money to left leaning charities focused on reducing economic inequality, and generally bringing these kinds of talking points up in general political discussion with others.

          There’s something else that’s commonly overlooked though, and that’s local policy. Think of a city’s “town hall” type meetings that accept public comment. How many people in that city are actually regularly attending a town hall meeting? Think of how few people it really is during a particularly contentious proposal. Now imagine what it’s like when it comes to something like “housing and urban development: reducing the rate of homelessness - meeting no. 57” Almost nobody. Get yourself and a few friends down to your local relevant policy meetings, make even a little noise, and the amount of change you can make as a result can be drastic compared to the actual % of the city’s population you make up.

          Pushing for things like ranked-choice voting in local elections can also be very viable, since it’s proven that tends to push voters further left, on average, and it also adds some extra competition that can spur a party like the Democrats into actual meaningful action.

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Most of us want the shithead gone just as bad as you do, but too many dumbshits decided they’d rather not stop him because the alternative wasn’t perfect. I hate it here.

      • wischi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Most? He already was president and over 50% voted that guy into office again? How are most people against him?

        • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          He didn’t get 50% of the vote.

          He won be cause either 6 million people didn’t vote or, to quote Trump, “[Elon] knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”

        • mdurell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          A surprisingly large number of people don’t vote. I refuse to believe that anything approaching half of voting-age Americans support this. Unfortunately, here we are.

            • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              I don’t think I would say non-voters support this.

              But they sure as fuck are complicit in not stopping an OBVIOUS threat to democracy by failing to do the absolute bare minimum civic duty of voting.

              Edit: fixed grammar

            • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              If as many people who turned up to vote would turn up to protest, things would change. Alas, liberals who think filling out the ballot is enough democracy for 4 years are not friends of democracy.

          • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            And even more didn’t vote in 2024 than 2020- and most of those who didn’t vote this time would have otherwise voted against Trump. 50% of US votes is far far less than 50% of people eligible to vote in the US.

        • runeko@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          50% of the people that voted in the last election voted for him. Some people didn’t vote, so about 33% of those that could vote voted for him. Since the election, his approval ratings dropped about 15-20%, so about 25% of those able to vote still support him.

          • Screamium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Further, it’s 50% of the people in the swing states that really decide things. I’m sure most New Yorkers and Californians that didn’t vote did so because they knew their state would go blue regardless.

            • runeko@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yep. The rule of thumb is that if you were in a swing state, your vote counted for about 5-6 votes because of the way the electoral college works.

              • blazeknave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                There is no equal representation as long as the lower house is capped and the upper house is equal.

                I have the same representation as millions of empty acres of land. It’s fucking bullshit. Taxes should work respectively. Your votes are worth more? Cool, foot the bill instead of me funding your backwards empty fucking state.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No, most of you either directly voted for him or didn’t care if he won.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They basically handed one of the strongest countries in the world to a very typical college bully and his lackies.

    • TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Let’s remember that there good people there too. Let’s remember that these scumbags, whichever country they run, rely on our sweat, tears and blood to move forward with their decisions. While not all of us are good, obviously, I want to believe that many Americans were tricked by media to think Trump was a valid choice. What we need to understand it’s that this is a us people versus them rulers. If only we would understand this together and stop fighting each other…

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The fact that a nation does fascist shit is never excused by the fact that there might be people who weren’t all bad. Or were even good.

        Sincerely, A German.

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        rely on our sweat, tears and blood to move forward with their decisions

        Agreed, so stop giving it to them. When I see Americans bring the country to a screeching halt through protest, disobedience, and strikes I will believe in the good people there.

        “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I mean, that counts for Russia as well, but until recently you couldn’t say anything like this without getting attacked

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m sure the media played a part.

        But fuck. He was so obvious with his racism, with his desire to be a dictator, fuckin everything.

        Fuck.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      its better to move on and forget about them, because they made it very clear over the last 10 years these types of people absolutley do not give a fuck about anyone elses opinion, and would much rather kill anyone who gets in their way.