The researchers found an average of around 100 microplastic particles per liter in glass bottles of soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea and beer. That was five to 50 times higher than the rate detected in plastic bottles or metal cans.

“We expected the opposite result,” Ph.D. student Iseline Chaib, who conducted the research, told AFP.

“We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, color and polymer composition—so therefore the same plastic—as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles,” she said.

The paint on the caps also had “tiny scratches, invisible to the naked eye, probably due to friction between the caps when there were stored,” the agency said in a statement.

This could then “release particles onto the surface of the caps,” it added.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Title seems misleading.

    As the micro plastics were found on the paint outside the bottle cap. It seems complicate that that ended on the drink itself. Unless you are licking the bottle cap it doesn’t seem that relevant.

    • Gobbel2000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The paint on the caps also had “tiny scratches, invisible to the naked eye, probably due to friction between the caps when there were stored,” the agency said in a statement.

      This could then “release particles onto the surface of the caps,” it added.

      Paint scratches off the outside, then sticks to the inside and makes it into the drink.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        Landing on the outside surface though, how is it making it through the cap?

  • be_gt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So nothing coupled to the glass but rather the cap having a extra plastic layer on the wet side.

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Step 1: Invent plastic bottles

    Step 2: Pocket the cash

    Step 3: Things got bad? Outsource the clean-up to the end user in the form of recycling

    Step 4: Increase prices to account for recycling

    Step 5: Laugh as the idiots actually recycle your shit

    Step 6: Throw the whole shebang in the ocean or in landfills

    Step 7: Pocket some more cash

    Step 8: Pat yourself on your shoulder. You’ve done some capitalism.

    • bollybing@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You forgot the step where they invent a logo that looks almost the same as the recyclable logo and stick it on all plastics but it doesnt mean its recyclable but instead just says what kind of plastic it is.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Man on the surface this reeks of inside payoffs. I guess the technicality is plastic caps on glass bottles?? Which seems weird and nothing I’ve ever seen. Unless they’re referencing the seal on the inside of some metal caps on glass bottles? Either way, seems suspect. I’d assume that overall drinking from glass is safer, as with plastic on any timeline you’re dealing with the plastic breaking down and leaching chemicals and micro plastics into the liquid, which wouldn’t be an issue with glass.

    • Infinite@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not plastic caps, plastic paint. The printing on bottlecaps is a polymer and it gets scuffed.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Odd. I would have thought that the paint, being on the exterior, wouldn’t leak into the beverage contained inside the glass.

        But apparently, they found that blowing air over the caps reduced the amount of detected contamination by 60 per cent. So it seems like an easy fix that manufacturers can implement inexpensively (literally just an electric fan)

        • scrion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Unfortunately, it’s probably not going to be an electric fan, but compressed air. Even more unfortunately, compressed air turns out to be a major cost factor due to the cost of running compressors, which might prevent adoption.

          The original paper mentions blowing the caps out with an “air bomb”, which I’m pretty sure is a mistranslation stemming from the French term “Bombe d’Air Comprimé”, i. e. an air duster, a can of compressed air. In an industrial setting, you’d use a compressor for this, naturally.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            There is a real reason that the caps are painted. Glass beverage bottles are usually stored in a crate and grabbed from the top, so the design on the lid is what restaurant or store employees used to distinguish what drink is contained within it. This allows employees to distinguish similar-coloured drinks (e.g. Coca-Cola vs Pepsi or two different brands of beer) just from looking down at the top of the bottle.

            But there probably is a way to paint them without using plastics

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Which is easier? Squatting down to count how many caps say “Coca-Cola” or counting the number of bottles with red caps?

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Wholly and entirely dependent on the designs. Even barely two-tone patterns (as in low contrast) can be easily distinguishable.

        • chuymatt@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You make a lot of them. They are flat. They get painted, they get punched out, (this is where the ‘magic’ happens) they get shuffled around to load into machines to put them on the bottles, they go through the machine and they get clamped to the bottles.

          There! Instant plastics!

    • Cawifre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The paint itself on the outside of the bottle cap. The ultra thin layer of (apparently polymer a.k.a. plastic) paint that make the cap not just metal colored.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      their caps are fully plastic, not painted metal. The non-screwtop metal caps need to be bent to release their grip on the bottle. That scrapes the paint off the metal cap.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        it’s more likely that paint is scratched off by other caps, idk about metal caps but plastic ones are usually handled in bags, thrown into a cap feeder that aligns them and loads them into the capper. I expect metal caps to go through a similar process, and all that movement is bound to scratch it and send particles everywhere.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Ok, great find, we can simply switch the caps & solve the problem.
    (The corps will do that, right??)

    But I wander with such tests … could there be any significant detection issues?

    Did they have the proper equipment and processes? A methodological limitation to particle size maybe?
    Coz some researches find higher concentrations than 100.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Parent commneter implies that people who consume soft drinks or alcohol aren’t concerned about their health because these beverages are not healthy

    • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What about kombucha? Ice tea? Water?!?! Would be nice to know that anything you consume regardless of how healthy or not doesn’t contain micro plastics or other contaminants.

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re forgetting all the kombucha and juices that use glass bottles, and more so those than plastic. Though I think kombucha does that because the kombucha will eat through the plastic.