Summary

Rep. Dan Crenshaw criticized Apple Maps for not renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, as mandated by Trump’s recent executive order titled “Restoring Names that Honor American Greatness.”

Crenshaw’s complaint reflects broader conservative frustration, as tech platforms and the global community continue to use the original name.

Critics compare the move to past nationalist gestures like renaming french fries “freedom fries,” accusing conservatives of embracing identity politics and culture wars despite their political dominance.

The name change is unlikely to gain international traction.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Fuck, I honestly thought this was the Onion. Somebody get me out of this timeline. I withdraw consent for this simulation!

    • slingstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Thank you for your service, sir/madam. You’re already a better executive than some presidents I can think of, thinking of what the people want.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        As the first matter of business I need to immediately address, my resignation. No one man is equipped to weild the power of the lemexcutive for much longer than I have.

        Farewell lemmings. Until we shit post together again.

        • slingstone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Good night, sweet prince(ss)! Though your reign in this (lemmy.) world was short, your reign in our hearts will last at least a few more minutes!

  • bobagem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Who’s gonna tell him?

    The earliest known use of the name America dates to April 25, 1507, when it was applied to what is now known as South America. It is generally accepted that the name derives from Amerigo Vespucci, the Italian explorer, who explored the new continents in the following years on behalf of Spain and Portugal, with the name given by German cartographer Martin Waldseemüller.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naming_of_the_Americas

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Waldseemüller

      It’s a good thing the continent wasn’t named after him instead!

      Then again, having a swim in the Gulf of Waldseemüller sounds kind of nice.

      • froh42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        For all the non-Germans, Herr Waldseemüller or one of his ancestors probably was a miller at a lake in the forest. That’s what the components of his name say, and we already have a body of water here.

      • froh42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Having a step dad from Buenos Aires, I’m offended you forgot Argentina. But they have their own kind of crazy MAGA there, currently…

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Sorry if this has been asked elsewhere, but who even has the legal right to rename the gulf? It doesn’t belong to USA, right? So we can’t just rename it, right? If we did, everybody else in the world would keep calling it The Gulf of Mexico, right?

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If we did, everybody else in the world would keep calling it The Gulf of Mexico, right?

      Most countries don’t call it “The Gulf of Mexico”. For example in my country it’s “Mexický záliv”.

    • vin@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Every sovereign state can publish maps require everyone to use it as reference for further publication in its own territory. Hence you’ll see different maps on Google for different regions. There’s a UN committee to coordinate these and also to publish international water area names.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Anyone else remember “freedom fries”? That’s what we were supposed to call french fries when conservatives were upset that the French were not supporting the US invasion of Iraq.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    There is no gulf with that name anywhere in the world.

    You’ll have to go back and figure out what you mean. Feel free to let us know once you find the name of a real gulf.

      • sgtgig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Executive Orders are closer to press releases than they are to law. They can say pretty much anything - whether those things are enforceable or even consistent with reality is up to the courts.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Executive Orders are more like a corporate memo to the government. It’s not a law passed by congress, but it can direct the government in how to administer existing laws or regulations.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ahem. Umm, conservatives are angry that others are not calling something what THEY want it to be called?

    Hmm. So… I just feel like… perhaps, there’s a similarity here. Some people… want to be referred to a specific way… but usually conservatives have a problem with that.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      How about the rest of the world rename it to the “Gulf of Snowflakes” and see what America does

        • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The three foot snow drift against my back door here in New Orleans would beg to differ.

          Tbf, nothing like that has ever happened here before. I wonder if any kind of change is causing this? Hmmm.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            What are the odds that a snowflake would rename the Gulf of Mexico and then it immediately actually snows on the Gulf of Mexico?!

            On a serious note, hope you all are doing OK down there and it will melt ASAP.

            • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Thanks, I think everything will be alright if people just stay off the roads for a few days. We’re used to driving through water but not on ice.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      So, the Gulf of They/Them is what the rest of the world should call it? I can get behind that.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s literally what the headline is. “Deadnaming” is a term for referring to transgender people by their previous names, rather than their current names.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Honestly that makes more sense than Gulf of America because at least it is a bit more descriptive. Looking forward to Mexico renaming Gulf of California next.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Wait, that really happened? I thought the gulf of Mexico renamed shit was just memeing. Google maps still shows the proper name instead of the tantrum name.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        17 hours ago

        There is no legal mechanism to compel private companies to use the new name.

        There is also no legal mechanism to require any other country on the planet to pay attention to Trump’s stupid and pointless attempt at renaming it.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If anything they’ll just show the new name to people in the US.

        Google Maps does a lot of regional fuckery to comply with local lunatics. Indians see Kashmir as part of India, for example.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, that’s every multinational company.

          My job has international offices and during stand-ups, we get things like “Hey EU needs this thing. So figure it out engineers.” And we do the bare minimum to meet the requirements because bro I’m just trying to code and make a paycheck.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Nope.

            I do vaguely remember seeing the bonkers border ceremony in a Michael Palin travel show from about 30 years ago. Seemed competitive, yet oddly friendly.

            • bomibantai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Not familiar with the show but that was definitely the Atari border ceremony at wagah in Amritsar, Punjab and not Kashmir.

              Either way, don’t try to equate anything happening near Kashmir to what is happening here. Those are land borders with people living on either side with very real tangible “everyday” problems to whatever pax Americana you have going on in the US.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I thought the gulf of Mexico renamed shit was just memeing.

      I have a feeling we’re going to be seeing a lot of “I didn’t think he would really do ____” in the coming weeks and months.

      I was under no such illusions. He has no one to stop him this time around.

      • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean, in this case, he has the rest of the English-speaking world to stop him with stupid renaming. If everyone just refuses to call it anything other than the Gulf of Mexico, it’s not like he can do anything about it, especially if they’re outside of the US.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It will be interesting to see what openstreetmap do - they have an “on the ground principle” that says to look at what the local signs say when naming something, but the data is tagged with a load of references to NOAA pages on historical treaties that the US signed (which obviously used the normal name for that area)

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I thought “we’ll build a wall and have Mexico pay for it” was just shit-talking, too.

      Trump has the habit of saying shit like this. His opponents will say “Oh god the cringe, it hurts”. His supporters will say “Oh shit, I didn’t think that we have to actually implement this? This will cause all sorts of expensive problems.”

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        To be fair, that was just shit talking. He may have started building the wall, but Mexico didn’t pay for it

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Maybe, but this is all a distraction from the actions that matter. They don’t want to debate the anti-trans stuff or the immigration stuff, which is objectively bad. They want to debate people not going with a made up name for a thing, which has no objectivity. The longer they can argue about this the less time there is to discuss anything important.

      Its not just being thin skinned. It’s a strategy of distraction.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        1 day ago

        what’s funny is Trump didn’t directly change the name. that takes time. the relevant naming-people have to take it up and formally do it. All Trump did was order them to, and, uh, that only affects goverment things.

        Everybody else, Apple included, are going to be using the familiar name. because Trump is a moron.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          22 hours ago

          They’ll follow suit. Apple is not the company people think it is. Tim was at the information along with all the other oligarchy. I know people well make excuses like he had to and blah blah blah. But no he did not. This a a openly gay man who chose to go support people who hate him why because he loves money more.

        • andallthat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know… Isn’t naming (and even country boundaries) already localized based on where the users are? Isn’t a possible scenario that Apple and others could show Gulf of America to US users and Gulf of Mexico to everyone else without even spending too much effort?

          • veroxii@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yeah there’s already support to name things differently based on your locale. If you have an English locale you see “Germany”. Inside German it’s called Deutschland and if you’re in a Spanish speaking place it’s Alemania.

            You could probably distinguish between en-us and en-gb to have different names in the USA and UK.

            So yeah I totally think it’s possible.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean yes they could be if the order affected them. I mean as everyone famously says they are beholden to the rules of the country they are in.

      • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        22 hours ago

        EOs are not laws and can only direct the federal government’s actions. The President has no authority to unilaterally control a company, except for scenarios where it is interacting with the federal government. Just like the “two genders” EO, it only applies to the federal government. States and companies can continue to support non-binary and other options for sex and gender identity.

        • pixelscript@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          One can more or less envision the President as the CEO of Federal Government, Inc. and executive orders as internal memos to the employees.

          If you don’t work there, following the memo is not your problem.

          But if you do any kind of business with someone who does work there, you can be hit by the secondhand effects.

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No, executive orders are not laws, and they apply only to the federal government. The reason for that is the president is not a king, and so their word cannot be law. That requires congress to make the law, and the Supreme Court to uphold it, if that law is challenged.