• Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I dunno, but it does have the worst UI this side of the 60s.

        (the new version is supposed to finally fix this but… [x] doubt)

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 days ago

        Whenever I use gimp, and have to draw square, circle, text or a similar shape I swear I need to search the net for the answer.

        You can do everything, but it is very counter intuitive to a noob. I don’t need to use gimp/Photoshop so I regularly forget it and need to look it up every time. I’m sure that for somebody who uses it regularly it is intuitive.

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          My Gimp workflow heavily involves Inkscape for that reason. If you need shapes, curves, text, moving stuff around, even scaling and rotating, Inkscape is much better. It’s only when I actually have to edit something in an existing image that I open Gimp. And sometimes when I need a complicated guideline, I’ll create it in Inkscape, export to png, import in Gimp, just so I don’t have to use the shape tool.

          • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Absolutely LOVE Inkscape! It even helped me to avoid having to purchase expensive embroidery software!

            Plus, when I deliver artwork / graphics to web builders, they’re ecstatic that I send SVG files instead of shitty jpegs.

            1000% support Inkscape. ❤️

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        The last time I used gimp…it does but in like a really weird way. It’s not intuitive.

        Iirc you take the circle selection tool and then make a path. Which you then assign a brush width and then a color.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          yeah, I remember it like that too

          It’s as intuitive as moving the paper under the pen to draw something

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago
    1. Take a picture of the original text with your phone at an angle.
    2. Email the crooked image to yourself.
    3. Copy the rotated text from the crooked image into the destination image.
    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s way harder than what I do, but I’m lucky enough to have access to a flat bed scanner. I just print it out, and then scan it at every angle. That way when I email the scanned photos to myself I have all the angles at once.

  • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 days ago

    Comments saying “you don’t” are weak shit. The answer is you rotate each letter one by one.

    It will look like shit because they will be ever so slightly misaligned, but such is the fate of the brave

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      4 days ago

      GiMP needs to die. It is a misbegotten heap of well-intentioned, functional, held-together-with-love-and-bubble-gum half effort

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you don’t like it, buy a photoshop subscription instead, it’s a heap of big corporate greed, money drain intended, functional, held together with ai features and licensing scams full effort.

          • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Everything in the cloud is their property. And everything works in the cloud, so. Yeah. Cloud software is awesome. Pay per month, everything you make isn’t your property. It’s double penetration without lube, while all you wanted to do is some photo editing or illustrating.

            Piracy is the answer. Back in the days you would miss out on things when pirating, compared to the purchased version. Now you’re missing out when you pay, compared to piracy. Why would I pay to have more restrictions and less rights then when I pirate for free? When I get caught with an illegal copy of photoshop, whatever I created will still be my property. I’ll get a fine, but still have more rights then a paying customer.

            It’s a fucking dystopian world we live in.

            If the person who died in Disneyland due to their allergy never used Disney+ but would have illegally downloaded a Disney movie instead, the lawsuit wouldn’t have been rejected by Disney as they never lost their rights by agreeing to their terms of service.

            I rather have the risk to get a fine for illegal downloading then to pay to lose my rights.

            So whenever there’s an open source project, no matter how imperfect it may be, to help people achieve their goal without mega corporate rape, I wouldn’t dare say anything bad about it. I don’t want to pirate, I feel like I have no choice and open source projects like Gimp are a great alternative. Also, I don’t mind paying for something if it would become my property and I would keep my rights and privacy.

      • SeekPie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        It doesn’t need to die, it needs to be improved.

        It’s like saying this app is kind of ugly. Let’s kill all the progress it has made and start over.

          • SeekPie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Nah, it doesn’t need to impress shareholders. It already is known as GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program). If they were to rename it, it would lose its name recognition.

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        fork it and make it better or pay someone else to or accept the downvotes for irrationality

      • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nope, I’m really used to GIMPs workflow and would actually prefer if they didn’t change it. I don’t want to learn a whole new program for no benefit. If you really care go use Krita.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Each letter gets it’s own text box. You rotate them once by one. You’ll need to measure distance from inner perimeter of the circle and manage the exact angle to center. So a protractor, string, or drawn line can help. (Draw the line before putting the center picture in.

    Source - Am Millennial, MSPaint was it back in the day.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or, alternatively, use a professional paint program. Which does not necessarily have to be commercial.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Instead of using MS Paint, maybe you should use Inkscape for such projects. It can easily align text along lines, but the best thing is that it is vector based, so the images easily scale. Very useful for logos.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can always export an Inkscape image as a bitmap in whatever resolution you’ll probably need.

        I once did an export with a width of >10000px (85cm ~=33.5in @ 300dpi). Yes, the file size sucked. But it looked good.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or GIMP, yes, but for that kind of logo, Inkscape is definitely the better choice.

        It always depends on the project.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Gimp is free, but God is the interface terrible.

        Lots of free software is great. I love my QGIS and Inkscape, but Gimp just can’t replace photoshop for me.

        • April (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Good thing is that GIMP 3.0 is right around the corner, bringing a port from GTK2 to GTK3 and with that a much more modern GUI.

          Inkscape would still be better for this in particular though.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    You don’t, Microsoft realized back then that this is the coolest it could ever looked and thusly removed that ability permanently.

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    On Windows Paint is like Notepad. Barely functional. There are layers now though, which is a step into right direction. For anything decent you need 3rd party software.

    Or use online editor like Photopea or Vector Ink. Checked just now and you can warp text there.