Summary

A Gallup poll shows 62% of Americans believe the government should ensure universal healthcare coverage—the highest support in over a decade.

While Democratic backing remains strong at 90%, support among Republicans and Independents has also grown since 2020.

Public frustration with the for-profit healthcare system has intensified following the arrest of a suspect in the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, reportedly motivated by anger at the industry.

Recent controversies, including Anthem’s rollback of anesthesia coverage cuts, and debates over Medicare privatization highlight ongoing dissatisfaction with the system.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Here’s the thing… having health coverage doesn’t mean jack crap.

    I’ve told my story before, it got best of’d on reddit and such, but it bears repeating why we need Universal Health Care:

    tl;dr lost my doctors due to an insurance change 4 weeks in to a 6 week open heart surgery recovery…

    In 2018, my company was in the process of being sold. No big deal, above my paygrade, nothing for me to worry about.

    Then I got sick right after Thanksgiving. Really bad heartburn that lasted 5 days. It wasn’t heartburn. I had a heart attack. 12/3/2018 I had open heart surgery, single bypass, and that started a 6 week recovery clock.

    On 1/1/2019, the sale of my company closed and we officially had new owners. I also officially lost all of my doctors because the new employers don’t do Kaiser in Oregon. They do it in WA and CA, but each state has to be negotiated and they never had presence here.

    1/2/2019 I start working with Aetna to find doctors, hospitals, etc. Beyond the cardiologist I need a new pharmacist, podiatrist, diabetes care and a general “doctor” doctor.

    Fortunately, my new employer is a big enough fish, they have their own concierge at Aetna and she gets me into the Legacy Health system.

    On 1/3/2019 I start developing complications, but I don’t know it at the time. It starts with a cough. All the time. Then, when I try to lay down, like to sleep, I’m drowning, literally choking and gagging.

    The concierge and I try to get an appointment, we’re told 2-3 months. For a dude still recovering from open heart surgery? Best they could do is 2 weeks. 1/14/2019.

    I can’t lay down to sleep so I buy a travel neck pillow and sleep sitting up.

    I get to see the new doctor at the “official” end of the 6 week recovery. He doesn’t know me or my history so he wants to run tests.

    I’m sitting at home playing video games and waiting on test results when the call comes… Congestive heart failure. Report to the ER immediately.

    My heart developed an irregular heart beat, which caused fluid build up in my chest. They admitted me and were getting ready to pull fluid off me.

    “What happened to your foot?”

    “I dunno, what happened to my foot? I can’t feel my feet.”

    Remember when I said I was sitting around playing video games, waiting for test results? Yeah, my foot was touching a radiator and I didn’t know it. 3rd degree burns, first four toes. Pinkie was spared.

    So I’m in the hospital a week. I lose 4 liters of water per day. 50 lbs. of water. No wonder I was drowning. Regular bandage changes.

    So now I’m facing two procedures. Electrocardio version to fix my heart, skin grafts to fix my toes.

    This whole time the new insurance covers 80% until I reach the out of pocket maximum of $6,500. Then it will cover 100%.

    The old insurance? ER visit for heart attack, hospital admission, 8 days in the hospital, open heart bypass… $250. $100 for meds and all the oxygen bottles I can carry.

    So we hit the out of pocket maximum almost immediately. My wife had a problem with her foot running through the Seattle airport. The doctor who did her toe amputation was decided to be out of network so that was another $1,100.


    I was never unemployed through all this. I had enough vacation and sick time banked to cover it. Cobra didn’t apply. Continuity of care didn’t apply because the new hospital DID have a cardiac department. Buying my old insurance wasn’t an option, it was far too expensive without employer backing. Income is too high for assistance (thank god) and I took steps to max out my HSA account, which is good because we drained it twice.

    Three 1 week hospital stays (2 for me, 1 for my wife), multiple ER visits, two more major medical procedures… That would be enough to break most people even with good insurance.

    So if you read any of that, let me ask you something… Why does the quality of my health care and my quality of life have to depend on who I work for and what insurance companies they choose to work with?

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    12 days ago

    How is it only 62%?! Who actually looks at their medical bill and thinks, “Yep, this is accurate and absolutely worth every penny”? I have health insurance, and I still avoid going to the doctor unless I’m practically dying because I simply can’t afford it.

    And yet, I’m stuck paying nearly $10k a year for insurance—just in case something catastrophic happens—only to still face massive copays, out-of-pocket costs, and coverage denials. It’s completely counterintuitive.

    The system is broken.

    Screw the insurance industry.
    Screw the state of medical care in the U.S.

    Healthcare shouldn’t be a privilege—it’s a human right. Normalize that.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      12 days ago

      The other 38% are either young and healthy enough to have never have had to deal with the healthcare industry or are just so staunchly individualistic they’d rather die than let someone else get a ‘handout’. ‘Taxes are theft’, ‘why should MY money go to blah’, me me me. Lack of empathy and/or a very naïve understanding of what society is actually for.

    • fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Red state here - the biggest argument I hear all the time is that if we get public healthcare the care quality will go down and we will have to wait 8 hrs to get seen for a heart attack. They point to Canada’s system and say most Canadians wish they had our system. So the answer, as always, is brainwashing.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      i say this as a huge supporter of single payer but also as a trans person.

      in an ideal world, a national health system is great but then you also look at places like the uk where wait times for gender affirming care are up to four years and both puberty blockers are on the verge of being banned by the left of centre party.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        The reasons for that, though, are largely because the NHS has been under attack by the right wing for more than a decade. It was a huge inflection point for Brexit, and there’s been a major effort to break it so they can point at how broken it is.

        Don’t use the NHS issues to judge how such a system would or should work for trans care. It’s been actively sabotaged.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          my point was that it’s susceptible to it in the first place… and the attacks on trans care come from both the tories and labour

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            All social* systems are susceptible to bigotry, and fascistic capitalism most of all.

            Labour isn’t perfect by any stretch, but pretending both sides have been equally to blame is just as unfortunate in the UK as it is in the US, Germany, Australia, and Canada. One side may be slow to put your needs to the fore, but make no mistake, the other wants you dead.

    • Greee1911@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      38% are the, I never have to go to the doctor. I never get sick. Until one day, they realize what an absolute nightmare the healthcare system is. 38% are probably the percentage that have had use for anything other than doctors visits.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I vote blue out of harm reduction, but don’t kid yourself.

      The single greatest acheivement Democrats crow about was a healthcare band-aid originally conceived by the Heritage Foundation and instituted by a Republican governor designed to further enshrine private, for profit insurers like United Healthcare cut in as the entire point.

      When the people screamed “Help us left wing from this for profit deathcare hell! Here’s a supermajority!” they protected the profit motive in what gets covered and declared victory.

      They can make excuses, there’s always several, but as the decades go by and nothing changes, advocating patience starts to sound like “well just be patient, maybe my nepo great grandkids will magically decide to start being civil and equitable with your peasant great grandkids, lol.”

      • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        There is no planet on which UHC or anyone else wanted to be forced to cover patients with pre-existing conditions at anything resembling a reasonable cost.

        Do I think Obama gave up way too much in negotiations? Absolutely. Do I think you’re a moron if you think this was “all part of private insurance’s master plan”? Absolutely.

        There’s a reason Trump keeps talking about “replacing” Obamacare. And it’s not just his ego, private insurance wants it gutted.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          For profit insurers absolutely did, because they did the math and knew the mandate would more than make up for the new rules, and it did, hence the ever rising profits since. I’m sure neoliberals and Republicans don’t see that as a problem because herp derp it’ll trickle down lol, but everyone else correctly does.

          That was the supposed trade, but surprise surprise, for all the protections the ACA proponents claim it enshrines, they still find way to initially deny 1 out of 7 claims, and now some with AI.

          Great deal, a larger captive customer base without a public option, and still denying swaths of claims using technicalities and loopholes their floors of attorneys never stopped working on in bad faith since. Because publicly traded companies never, ever operate in good faith towards their customers, there’s always an angle to goose earnings beyond what was overtly agreed to.

          It helped some people, but it didn’t address the core problem of American Healthcare that makes it the most expensive on Earth with some of the worst outcomes in the developed world at all: the profit motive middleman dictating who gets what care instead of doctors. The more Americans who prepared for illness and paid them in good faith that they murder, the more gold in their pockets, to the applause of the profiteers on Wall Street.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Rioting, violence, maybe a war, who knows, societal collapse? It’s all extremely interesting if not insanely frightening.

      There’s tons in store for us over the next little while.

      Here’s hoping the raving gangs of warlords that inherit the earth have a Morpheus type figure among them who is benevolent.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Sounds like 62% of Americans should have voted for the candidate that might have actually made that possible.

    • iMastari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Bernie Sanders tried but did not get enough votes when he ran for president because the government paying for your healthcare is apparently bad for some reason.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Its bad for profits. And since the government is run by people with a vested interest in profits, it wont change anytime soon. All the oligarchs have to do is convince enough rubes that universal healthcare is bad, and it will never see the light of day.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 days ago

        Its important to make incremental progress. Kamala was a standard dem like Joe. Still they are open to hearing good ideas; compared to Trump.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Trump is open to hearing good ideas too. Problem is, “good” is highly subjective.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 days ago

        “but I couldn’t vote for the Democrats in good faith!!!”

        Well now you’ve helped elect Trump. Hope that aligns with your morals!

        (General “you”, not you specifically)

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Tbf the Democrats aren’t particularly interested in addressing healthcare either… the money has to be removed from the system for it to improve. It is currently working as designed.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Only 23% of people living in the USA voted for Trump

      That is 65% more than the percentage of people that, according to this post, dont want health coverage for everyone

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        23% voted for Trump, and 55% also indirectly did by not voting or going third-party.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 days ago

    Not “coverage”, “affordable coverage”. I don’t want coverage through whatever capitalist exploit insurance company. I want affordable healthcare without lifesucking middlemen

    • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      The coverage the fire department provides is affordable. And my Library. And my streets. And the storm water system. And K-12.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Yeah but only sick people use healthcare so fuck them. /s

        Capitalist healthcare is class eugenics. CMV.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s a single payer health system. Government pays the health providers You pay the government through taxes.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    And the other 40% rely on the help and care of others every day while blabbering on about being “self-made” which actually just means “selfish asshole”.

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      America just voted to allow Ramaswamy and Elon to cut government by 75%. This will absolutely include healthcare. What will happen to that 75% that was under government? It will go to the private sector obviously. Now they can can become even richer. Holy shit Ramaswamy is like a real life Shooter McGavin

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thats not going to happen.

        The only thing they love more than bitching about government overspending, is benefiting from it. The whole DOGE will have less power in the government than the meme it’s based on, and the people who will run it are looking to line their pockets with your money for the least effort on their part.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          elon and ramaswamy are idiots sure but republicans will absolutely gut medicaid (first since it’s easier to take from disabled people than seniors) and the aca.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            They wont gut Medicaid, they’re just going to force it to take on huge debt while they cut taxes for the 1% and then say that it’s Democrat’s fault for overspending.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yet, they keep voting for the opposite. People seem too dumb to be allowed good things.

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Remember Biden beat Medicare. Democrats have never been serious about universal healthcare. Your choices in the US are “lip service” or “burn everything down”

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        American voters have been indoctrinated to think anything that in government initiated is “socialism.”

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          100% and the sad fact is it plays into the GOP/ Oligarchs hand.

          Messaging is important. Just look at the damage control corporate media is spewing out about UHC shooting.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      They have some form of decent coverage through work and no one in their personal sphere is overly sick to the point of causing them pain. They wish to block others from getting adequate access least they lose some advantage over them. They’re squarely in the F U I have mine camp. Of course as soon as something happens and theirs isn’t good enough, they’ll have a change of heart, while everyone else still in their camp holds them down.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        “Muh tax dollars cant be wasted on someone else’s health”

        Proceeds to vote for their tax dollars to be wasted on bailing out another business

  • 🐋 Color 🍁 ♀@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’s good that the majority support it, but it’s also concerning that 38% didn’t. The USA should have universal healthcare. I don’t want to say where I live or where I don’t live but if you live in a country which doesn’t have universal healthcare I genuinely feel bad for you.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      It’s because they don’t understand how the system works. Most people I know who are against it always go straight to “how could we pay for it”. Not understanding that countries that do it work directly with the manufacturers of the medicine and hospitals so they get much better rates. 2022 showed 6500 per person for full coverage in Canada. 12,500 per person in the U.S… with no coverage for the most part.

      We know some Republican candidates know this as well, which is why Desantis promised lower health care costs in Florida by cutting a deal with Canada to import their lower cost drugs by trying to skirt buying them from the companies the are giving tax breaks to and not addressing.

      Years later… No drugs have been shipped from Canada and no deals were settled because Canada doesn’t want to ship their drugs to Florida and have shortages.

      Much like an insurance company can say, I’m only going to pay $150 for that MRI instead of the $1,600 quoted, the government can do the same, and instead of lining the pockets of middlemen, it comes back as savings to the people. In general I believe I saw if we implemented a plan like Canadas, the average American would save 20% on their income taxes, and have full coverage. Meaning no longer having co-pays, deductibles, out of network doctors, etc. etc.

      To me it just says, if you want further specialists outside of the ones provided, you can pay for them just like you do now. And the government could pitch in only the cost that they would pay towards a standard patient procedure.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        “Medicare for all” became a slogan because it’s insanely more efficient than private healthcare. And we’ll pay for it with taxes, the same way we pay for anything. But if your taxes do go up, it will be by less than you were paying previously, so people are still saving money. They can only use the most reductive and cliche arguments because the evidence is all against them. A public health plan would be cheaper and provide more care.

      • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m wondering if this is like the British NHS and reports that “NHS pays 5 gazillion pounds for <med>” and the reality is we’re paying a fiver, or something.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Over 17% of our GDP goes to healthcare. Around 4.5 trillion dollars a year last I saw.

          $4,500,000,000,000. And the people pay out of pocket still for most everything they need.

          For reference, we pay more money than any other country besides China makes in an entire year.

  • brezel@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    somehow this doesn’t correlate with the > 50% that just voted against it.