• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    X will likely merge with TruthSocial as the defacto Conservative/Right-wing social media site (named something dumb like “XTruthXSocialX”), while BlueSky will become the defacto Liberal social media site.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh yea, he never turned off his mic. Pretty sure I heard his mom come down with tang and Oreos and he cussed her out

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That would be great - much better than the current situation where twitter is run like a right-wing site but still has people from across the political spectrum hanging out there due to inertia.

  • Account_93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    99% of my Feed on Bluesky was just people saying they’ve left Twitter for Bluesky. No amount of suggest less of this helped.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      On my feed it’s just pictures of pets and people who I don’t know making lists of things they like. But to be fair, I just installed the app today.

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      happens on every “new” social media platform that is similar to another social media platform. Was all over Lemmy when people were “boycotting” reddit…course most went right back to reddit when the boycotting was over.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Haha there is a gigantic wave of people switching over from twitter right now, that’s just what is on people’s minds. The conversation will move on soon enough.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Just like when Threads launched and or when Reddit made the API changes. You get a flood of new users who want to talk about being new users.

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Non-billionaire controlled so far. It’s a public benefit corporation, which is vulnerable to being Altmaned. Once it becomes valuable money will find a way.

        • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s where the federated angle comes in. Not quite there yet, but as the network grows the vulnerability to the original node getting taken over by a bad actor lessens.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            A feature that makes it easier for their users to migrate to a competitor? Blockchain Capital invests $15M in BlueSky. Insert that Anakin / Padme meme:

            Anakin: Now that we’ve invested, let’s make that federation feature priority 0
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?
            Anakin:
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Is blue sky federated? I thought it was another closed garden. If slightly more open than Twitter.

            • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Bluesky grew out of a project at twitter whose goal was to create a federated protocol. Then when they were split off from twitter when Musk took over they had to start their own twitter-style platform to be the first player in that federated protocol. Now that that part is running they’re gradually building out the originally planned system of allowing more servers to be part of the federation: https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/federation-architecture

      • portuga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No. Just the same shit with less users. Let it grow (by the millions as lemmy is trying to convince us) and you’ll see. I say we get back to smoke signals

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’ve started removing trash sites. I blocked twatter and reddit at my router.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Ha ha ha, yeah, sure. Bluesky won’t defeat xitter, at best it’ll just be the “next thing” once xitter finally finishes getting rid of most of its users, which I guess will take more than 4 years from now.

    • blarth@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’ll only defeat X if corporations and specifically media and sports entities start using it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The great thing about BlueSky is how under-the-radar its flown for the last few years. Virtually no advertising. No legions of bot accounts spamming with invites and generic attention baiting posts. No |>u33y N |3io blowing up my mentions. No enshittification, because its just a primitive clone of the original Bird Site.

      The more popular it gets, the less likely that’ll last. BlueSky won’t defeat Twitter until it becomes Twitter.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        My issue with BS is it took VC money from crypto bros.

        What do we think will happen when they come looking for their returns on investment?

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It will almost certainly become Twitter as it was created by the Twitter founder. The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over. Which is a massive difference.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s worse than that.

          Blockchain Capital LLC was co-founded by Steve Bannon pal Brock Pierce, a major crypto advocate, perennial presidential candidate, and close friend of Eric Adams. Pierce has dozens of other shady MAGA/Russia ties as well.

          https://toad.social/@davetroy/113476797192400901

          Dorsey’s already out, the people running the project are from the TESCREAL gang.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over.

          Dorsey is just as emotionally stunted and socially reactionary as Musk. He simply isn’t as wealthy.

          BlueSky has thrived not because Dorsey crafted it into a purer vision, but because he’s neglected it and allowed the user base to have their way.

          • realitista@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I never liked Twitter to begin with so I’m not one to defend him. My preferred one is Mastodon, but generally I don’t like the format to begin with. At any rate, I’ll still take pre-musk Twitter over Xitter any day.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Things were better before they got worse, sure.

              But the problem in these systems is the trade off between centralization (consolidated control and monolithic content) and federation (poor navigation/petty administrative feuds/less quality content). Switching from Twitter to BlueSky relieves you from the current admin’s fuckups, but you’re still stuck in a flawed system.

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I guess they don’t consider it bluesky defeating twitter if twitter is commiting suicide. Sounds like pedantry to me.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            The key factor in Digg’s demise was a flawed design that was too easily abused by users. Digg had no controls over user verification, so individuals could game the system by creating multiple accounts to artificially inflate the number of votes for their own content. Because Digg displayed content in order of popularity, most visitors saw and voted only on content that was already popular. This system created a vicious cycle in which a small number of dedicated users could push their own content to the front page and thereby gain more followers, allowing them to more easily repeat the process. As Digg grew, so too did its problems related to power-hungry users cheating and gaining undue influence over content.

            Sounds like the same problem that every centralized social media ecosystem suffers from. The big difference between Digg and Reddit was that Reddit successfully monetized the “push me to the front of the queue” algorithm rather than engineering around it.

        • Ihnivid@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think they meant twitter is worse than reddit and hope we don’t get an influx of twitter users.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yup. I’m also not super happy with Lemmy, but I’m too stubborn to go back. Meanwhile, I’m building my own rendition of Reddit, which will probably have the same problems, but at least I’m making an effort.

            If something genuinely good shows up, I’ll go there. But BlueSky ain’t it, so here I stay.

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I see BlueSkey as different than Lemmy. In my mind, Twitter = BlueSky and Mastodon and Reddit = Lemmy and Kbin (if that’s even still around).

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Agreed.

                I hate Twitter’s format though, so Mastodon isn’t interesting at all to me. I really like the Reddit setup where discussion is around a presented topic (whether a link or a text post), instead of the Twitter/Mastodon format where you follow general topics and people. I don’t care about individuals, I care about ideas, and Reddit/Lemmy seem to distill ideas around topics I care about better than Twitter/Mastodon. However, both Lemmy and Reddit tend to encourage echo chambers, which I strongly dislike, hence why I’m working on something else.

                BlueSky seems like Twitter 2.0, so I’m just as uninterested as I ever was in Twitter and Mastodon.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Why people cannot see that the core problem of twitter is not that it got bought by the asshole billionaire. It’s that the asshole billionaire was able to buy it.

    • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Wasn’t he forced to do so after trying to back out, or am I either imagining that or thinking of someone else?

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s a little more complex than that. He, like, was buying shares, blew past the 5% ownership disclosure point, failed to disclose, was forced to disclose his stake. He was then offered a seat on the board, didn’t like the lack of control, and made a meme offer on the remaining stake to take the company private, tried to pull out, and was forced to buy the company he didn’t want to buy by the board of directors who didn’t want him to buy it.

        He’s the recent Adam Conover interview with the details: https://youtu.be/sxG2Y3E0uEY?si=r0VMY7s3iZ9uaP39

      • CellarRat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If I recall correctly he could have backed out but he would have had to pay I think 1billion as a penalty and worse admit things didnt go his way

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          300 Billion dollar portfolio, 34 Billion dollar loss (~22 Billion after he writes it off in “taxes”) and he has his own right-wing media company chocked full of nutters.

          I don’t think he cares much about the individual Billions much these days. Half his Tesla stock is securing his debt.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Mastodon is more of a protocol than a single service. It succeeds/fails on those terms, in the same way the old Web1.0 protocols did. Which is to say, you can’t enshitify a thousand micro-sites at once like you can enshittify one big site that’s under central control. But you also can’t do things like navigate, search, and socialize efficiently.

      Mastodon is successful in large part because it isn’t. When you let a single cartel of corporate psychos run a Mastodon account like they would a Twitter or Facebook, you end up with Truth Social (literally just a Mastodon branch instance).

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        ActivityPub is the protocol though. Mastodon is an implementation of the protocol.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s an interesting perspective. Do you think the same about lemmy? While also decentralized using the sameprotocol, it seems reasonably efficient to me. I’m from a small instance from my country, and the global content is easily available to me.

        I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy… this is what I consider the main issue withthe fediverse as a whole.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Do you think the same about lemmy?

          I think it depends on how the federated sites are administered going forward. We’ve already seen bigger sites - like Threads, for instance - try to integrate into the overall ecosystem. And I could see a future in which one of the larger instances - a .world or .sh.itjust.works - is too much for a handful of amateur admins to handle. Hand off the instance to a venture capital firm and you could see rapid enshitification.

          I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy…

          I’m reasonably tech savvy and even I’d struggle to tell you exactly how it works. How is .world hosted? Is it load-balanced or otherwise optimized? Who controls registration and which other instances does it integrate with? How do you find a list of active instances to federate against? Who do you even talk to in order to federate with another instance? What does the API look like and which instances allow you to crawl them? How do bots integrate with the environment and what can an admin do to limit them? No idea.

          There’s a bunch of things I think I should be able to do but I can’t. For instance, signing into .world but only surfing content that’s hosted on .sh.itjust.works.

          There’s also a lot of petty politics. Admins deciding on a whim who to block, whether it be individuals or whole instances. Waking up one day and suddenly not having access to a dozen of my favorite subs, because two admins are feuding, is not particularly fun. I never have a problem like that on BlueSky or Instagram.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Bluesky is (in theory) federated, but I think you can’t run your own server yet. We’ll see if they keep their promise.

      Its protocol has some improvements over ActivityPub, for example you can use a domain name you own as your username even if you’re not hosting your own instance, and your user identity is portable in that case - you can move to a different instance but keep the same username.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They took crypto bros VC money.

        Do we really think they’ll allow mass federation without getting returns on their investment?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There was a good explanation about why not mastodon the other day. It basically boils down to Bluesky is just an easier transition.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s what I heard from my microblogging colleagues too. They tried Mastodon during the first wave of Twitter exodus, found it too frustrating/difficult, tried Bluesky and stuck with it ever since.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What’s the difference, really? Aren’t they both decentralized microblogging social networks?

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        One is a product with investors selling itself on promises of decentralization (bluesky), the other is a genuine community tool (mastodon) that actually provides decentralization.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Let’s replace one proprietary service with another. It looks so good with its API wide open, like it’s never getting enshittified.

    • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s obvious to me that we need to have laws to enforce portability of data and interoperability for large platforms.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I mean, this is one of the central pitches behind Web3.0/Crypto. Everything has a digital tag and its all going to be portable between platforms.

          Did it come to fruition? No, of course not. Its all a pile of scams. But then so was Web2.0 and Web1.0 during their heydays.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble

              This goes all the way back to '98, when the original slew of start-ups gobbled up investments only to flop a few years later. Web2.0 had its own bubble burst starting in 2008, taking down a host of the early social media ecosystems (MySpace, Yahoo, and Geocities, most famously). Huge upfront investments with the promise of explosive ROI that took far longer to materialize (or simply never did).

              A great deal of the valuation in these firms was built on lies and bullshit - misreported user activity, overly optimistic monetization estimates, and outright accounting fraud.

              2020 gave us what looked like was going to be a third Crypto bust wave (FTX being the big industry leader leading the charge). But the pivot to AI appears to have bailed a lot of the bigger investors out. We’ll see how long that lasts.

              • josefo@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Oh, I think I understand your point, but we do have different definitions of what a scam is.

                For me, if the guys getting fucked are capitalists or huge investing firms that were trying to leverage their money to make more money just from speculation and not being actually involved, that’s not a scam, that justice. Economic bubbles happen because big money guys are trying to gamble the system to start with, so karma.

                In the other hand, crypto scams are more close to a conman selling snake oil to the uneducated masses, that for me is a full fledged scam.

  • Juice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bummer that isn’t mastodon but any inconvenience to musk is appreciated

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I say this as someone who likes fediverse microblogging (Mastodon, MissKey, etc) it will never be Mastodon. Mastodon and its maintainers are staunchly against all the things that would make it a viable replacement to Twitter.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Mastodon is, like, fine, but it has one gaping flaw that makes it utterly unusable for me.

          Basically, the issue is you cannot be assured that any particular instance contains the entire conversation thread/replies, because they’re not necessarily sent to every server participating in the conversation.

          Bluesky fixes that by the ‘firehose’ feeds federating out to the PDSes and providing complete reply chains, which just flat out makes it a better experience since you can actually see what everyone is saying, not just what people on servers you might be following already are saying.

          It’s a giant stupid flaw in Mastodon (since other AP based platforms such as, for example, Lemmy don’t have it) and really should be addressed since it makes the platform darn near useless since why am I following people to only get half of what might be a useful thread?

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            that sounds crazy. that makes the idea of federation pointless imo… thank you for the response

            • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Yeah, it makes federation, especially if you run your own server and don’t have a large user base, largely broken.

              You’ll end up getting a shockingly small amount of replies to people you follow’s posts, which (for me) is the whole reason I’m here.

              It almost forces you onto a larger server if you want a reasonable experience (or you have to start ingesting huge amounts of data via relays), but I mean, at that point why not just use bluesky instead?

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They don’t like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

          That’s all I’ve got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it’s pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It’s insane that companies haven’t jumped on it.

          You don’t even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

          • Patch@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Threads (for better or worse) demonstrates that that’s not a fundamental obstacle for fediverse microblogging.

            If someone wanted to launch a Mastodon fork with algorithm-driven content discovery, they could do. Just as with Lemmy/kbin/mbin, the beauty of the fediverse is that different servers can take quite different approaches to use experience design whilst still maintaining compatibility with the rest of the community.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            This is what happens when someone can’t put themselves into their user’s shoes and then wonder why a product isn’t doing as well as it is.

            They proclaim the product is great, it’s everyone else that’s the problem

    • icogniito@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Actually not a bummer in my opinion, let people sort into different platforms based on their interests like we used to do with forums.

      A fragmented internet is a better internet

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I somewhat agree, but it’s not going to happen. If Bluesky wins this battle, they’re just going to be the dominant platform. It’s not going to spread out. It’s just going to migrate. A federated alternative would at least be spread out by design, though connected still.

      • Cordinel@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        But it’s not fragmented. Mastodon is still the odd “vegan” option while BlueSky is becoming the main Twitterlike platform. Mastodon is still coming out the other end mostly the same.

        • icogniito@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Yeah, and that’s a good thing specially for the reason I just mentioned

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just hope federal services (like applying for a passport) don’t become Twitter-only after Trump appoints Elon as Secretary of Enshittification.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      [Deleted]

      I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        It’s more than 4 years. We just crawled out of Trump inflation and now are going right back in.

        Dismantling and breaking is easy. They can do a lot of that in 4 yrs. Building takes decades.

        There’s also a global effect. Would Putin have ever attacked Ukraine without a Trump term? How about Israel’s taking self defense into genocide territory?

        America leads by example and the last example was an impulsive 3 yo with a giant military force and a dead diplomacy department in the executive branch. There’s permissiveness in that.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        107
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thing is, mate…fascists rarely stay inside their boarders. This is going to be the whole world’s problem in about 3 months.

      • glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        4 years if laws and constitution stay the same and are followed… first term he had people alienated into him who were at least slightly appropriated for their positions, this time people who has nothing to do with their positions are being appointed simply for being loyal to him… Let’s see if any of them won’t let him do anything drastic within 4 YEARS

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        68
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, most people are going to live their lives and see absolutely no effect from anything done. No single administration has the ability to totally fuck up the country in the amount of time they have. That’s why you get the big swings back and forth between the two parties. Also, the news is very good at sensationalizing absolutely everything and making you think that, oh my god, it’s the end of the fucking world. What are we going to do? Run around like chickens screaming with our heads cut off and shit.

        • Baggins@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          20 hours ago

          No single administration has the ability to totally fuck up the country in the amount of time they have.

          Trump: “Hold my Diet Coke”.

        • trajekolus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          ·
          1 day ago

          We know that Ukraine will be betrayed by the Trump government. A Russian victory will embolden Russia to further threaten Europe. This will also embolden China and other authoritarian states.

          We also know a Trump government will stop climate action. Unfortunately, this will also signal to many other governments that they can do the same.

          We also know that immense cruelties will be perpetrated such as the family separation policy of the 1st Trump presidency

          But yes, if you are white, straight and middle class or rich, you’ll be able to think all is OK until such time as the authoritarian ascendancy led by China and Russia affects your own life, which might be a decade or more away.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            46
            ·
            1 day ago

            How many people do you think would be affected by his deportation policies? I’ve heard a number of around 10 million, and that’s 3% of the population, which, while absolutely terrible, means that the other 97% isn’t going to really care.

            • zephorah@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Food prices will go up, not down. I think everyone cares about food prices right now.

              I’m not just talking about outdoor crop picking work. A friend was laid off from a food production company this week and Trumps not even sworn in yet. You can’t make this stuff up it’s so ridiculous. So, anticipate job losses for non immigrants as well.

              2/3 of the factory line is Hispanic, and the majority of that is rotating work visa people. In this way, you can pay much lower wages.

              Part of it was tariff threat, no one would place orders, everyone’s on hold on the production/supply/buyer chain, waiting for January, so the income of the business dropped to zero this week and is projected to stay there through January. Again, this is food production, not bread or flour, or anything basic like that, but it’s still food.

              So, with no income and the threat of loss of cheap production labor, all the American citizens were laid off this week. Whether or not the business will eventually declare bankruptcy is undecided, but that talk is definitely on the table.

            • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              45
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Those 3% (going by your math):

              Pick crops

              Contribute $90 billion or more in tax for the county via sales tax.

              Without those people, we have no food, and immediate inflation begins. You know, the thing everyone was bitching about that was literally caused by Trumps inaction on COVID.

              This affects EVERYONE in the US.

                • zephorah@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  I did just get a roof put on my house. Small, local business. All the office people were white, the work crew was 100% Hispanic with one bilingual guy who front manned communication. Idk how many were work visa, but given the number of serious injuries I’ve seen from work visas falling off roofs while doing construction and such while at work, it’s not just one company.

                  And before you go down the path of “they’re taking ‘our’ jobs” remember that there is a shortage of skilled labor and trades right now.

                  Also, if a company can pay at or near minimum wage for rappelling up the side of house, would you accept that wage given the liability/injury threat?

                  Housing prices go up in reaction to losing cheap labor, I guarantee it.

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 day ago

              I know the last time he was in office his immigration policies made it impossible for some people families to come over. I worked with a couple people struggling with that.

        • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          [Deleted]

          I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trump was already elected before and quickly became irrelevant after his 4 years.

            And who is going to be the next US President?

            And who is nominating a Russian asset to be DNI?

            And who is nominating a child sex trafficker to be AG?

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              And who is likely to nominate an antivax, anti-science lunatic with brain worms to head the dept of Health and Human Services?

              And who is planning to eliminate the department of education and NOAA?

              Previous administrations have done damage through incompetence and/or malice, but the plan this time is on another level. They’re going in with the goal of breaking everything.

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Dobbs and Chevron would disagree with your claim of “irrelevant”. You might not be aware, but that’s not the same thing…

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You mean head of DOGE? Because we live in the timeline where a terminally online edgelord with the brain of a 14yo and the body of a 54yo makes meme government agencies.

      Anyway, get your passport now. They’re good for ten years, enough to last at least through the tentative end of Trump’s circus.

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Countdown until it turns out that everybody associated with any competition to Musk’s companies just so happens to be a criminal Trump siccs his DOJ after: 5… 4…

    • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wouldn’t discount the possibility that bsky is backed by the same dark money pool that bought twitter. putin found that it’s way too easy to buy elections worldwide just using social media. They’ll never give it up.