• Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12 days ago

      I believe I was in sixth grade when that album came out.

      First of all, it used a whole lot of synthesizers, which were pretty new technology at the time, and I felt like I was living in the future when I heard it.

      As to the album cover, it somehow didn’t register with my that it was a baby smoking.

      Rather, it made me think of teenagers smoking in the high school bathroom.

      Motley Crue’s Smokin in the Boys Room came out a year later, so I don’t think that influenced my mental image.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Dude, synthesizers were not new in 1984. Also that was a cover song Motley Crue did. Originally released Brownsville Station in early 70s.

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 days ago

          They existed and were more of a new wave instrument at the time, but not heavily used in rock like that.

          I was unaware of Brownsville Station when I was eleven.

          Sorry to have failed your class professor.

          We couldn’t all be Jack Black in high fidelity at that age.

          • bitchkat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Synths were used so much in 70s rock (Moog) that it wasn’t uncommon for albums to have a ‘no synthesizers’ disclaimer.

            • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              And the synthesizers in the eighties were nothing like moogs

              Irrelevant I guess. I was casually reliving a memory from when I was a child, but there’s always got to be a pedant to further solidify my general withdrawal from society because I’m clearly not satisfactorily intelligent enough for it.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        When I was 15, my girlfriend’s mother was appalled that I had no idea who Motley Crue was, but I knew all the other bands she mentioned.

        I look back now and imagine it’s like meeting a teenager who knows Green Day and Oasis, but has never heard of Blink 182.

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    We have these pictures with warnings printed on the packs. Some are disgusting shit like rotten teeth and lung operations, but there is one of a child that inspects a cigarette. Every time I see that one, I have to think how that kid looks like a little version of Putin, but maybe I’m just crazy.

    This one

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    I really wish it wasn’t unhealthy. It looks so cool in old videos. And also the esthetics of a lit sigarette in an ash tray producing a line of smoke rising to the ceiling.

  • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    Is it just me, or does she look GINORMOUS compared to that child? He looks at least 3, but is the relative size of my 5 month old?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It may be child actor laws so they had to take a 2 or 3 year old and make them look as young as possible.

      Most babies in film are twins because they tend to be born earlier and thus look younger when they can first legally appear in a commercial film.

    • ivanafterall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t miss smoking, because it was so costly and I felt and smelled terrible. But I do miss the effortless social interactions it led to all the time.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m generally against “sin taxes” but I have to admit that the $2 bump per pack after I quit smoking made it easier to not look back. It’s now about $5 more (I think, I haven’t actually looked for a while.)

      After 18 years of smoking, I am glad I quit.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Me too, however I miss it less frequently as time passes.

      Still hits you when you least expect it, though, it’s a deep seated addiction.

      • ivanafterall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I quit and it never appeals to me anymore. Unfortunately, that’s because I switched to vaping and it worked way too well, which was the entire point (on their part). Quitting vaping will be a bitch.