• irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember this but never knew the extent of it.

    The CBS article says it originally happened because some person wasn’t allowed to bring their dog to work at city hall.

    This sounds like a 6 year old crying and saying “if I can’t have this, then THEY CANT HAVE THAT!!”

    Grow up.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, hypocrisy is something worth pushing back against, but only a jerk of a fool chooses to create more injustice as a response.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if cats are allowed they should allow dogs as well. I am also highly allergic to cats and break out in hives and a rash if I am around them to much. Got no problem with both

      • irish_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, I think you misunderstood. A person wasn’t able to take their dog with them to work at City Hall. In retaliation they wanted the cat gone from the Library.

        Two different buildings.

      • irish_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, I think you misunderstood. A person wasn’t able to take their dog with them to work at City Hall. In retaliation they wanted the cat gone from the Library.

        Two different buildings.