• pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    So in that killer’s mind, wanting someone killed was the morally indefensible crime but actually killing ludicrous numbers of people is not? And he nor anyone else questioned that? 🤔

    • MasterPraetorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bit of context and spoilers - He was making a statement about social media threats/harassment

      The first part - using social media - whoever people vote to be killed, gets killed. Trying to show these actions have consequences. The people voting feel immune to these consequences. They just voted, they didn’t kill anybody.
      He goes through 5 rounds of voting, with more votes every time. After each round, the most voted for is killed.

      Up to this point he’s exposing people trying to use social media to try and harm people Eventually he turns it around, and kills everyone who voted

      The whole thing kicked off because his friend/romantic interest tried to commit suicide from cyber bullying. He’s pushing that these actions have consequences, even if you hide behind a screen.

      The killer himself is a psycho, so the morals aren’t exactly impactful to him. As for anyone else questioning, the definitely do.

      Disclaimer - been a while since I watched the episode. It’s pretty good, definitely need some suspension of disbelief (but that’s most episodes)

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get that what he’s trying to do, it’s just his actions are self-defeating. The only reason the behavior on social media has violent consequences is because he’s imposing them; no one else in that story is killing people based on meaningless Facebook polls. They only matter because he makes them matter. He causes the problems he thinks he is solving.

        Also he assumes his actions will make people reconsider their choices and change, which they won’t because people for the most part aren’t capable of change. Most people don’t have the ability to do so. Those who do deliberately refuse to because they’re happy the way they are regardless of their true nature’s consequences to other people.

        It’s just a stupid gimmicky show pretending to be deep to get views. That’s all.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is how every episode of Black Mirror is. Just little interesting “what if” scenarios that make you think. In the same way that fairy tales are contrived and unrealistic these are too.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The fact that there’s some discussion going on about it is evidence of that. It’s similar to the “would you press a button for a million dollars but a random person on earth dies” type of question. “Does voting to kill someone mean your responsible for the murder if they’re going to kill someone anyways?”

        • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Behavior on social media can definitely have consequences in real life, even violent. Many shooters vere radicalized by social media groups, for example.