• bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Double the minimum wage and standardize a four day work week. People need more free time and resources in order to socialize effectively.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Couple this with providing safe and comfortable community spaces and every things peachy.

      No, the local Starbucks/any place of business does not count.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is a big one for me. Decoupling social activities from consumerism so people can access human connection without implicit or explicit paywalls.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nationalizing dating sites.

    These sites work great to match people when corpos aren’t allowed to fuck with the algorithms

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    More public transit and more public spaces. Transit that you don’t have to think about taking (because it’s safe, frequent, and cheap or free) takes you to new places or to familiar places more often, and lets you meet more people more often. And going outside and doing shit is just good for you, I’m sorry to report.

    • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t work. I live in Hong Kong, which has some of the world’s most efficient public transport systems. People don’t actually talk. They just look at their phones. A train cart can be full of people but no conversation.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Public transit isn’t for socializing, it’s for traveling. Public spaces like parks, libraries, squares, etc that don’t require payment to use are for socializing.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree. I think a big part of the issue is that going out to do things is just so expensive these days. There aren’t any “third places” for people anymore.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The neighboring village just built a smallish sk8erpark for the youth. Quite nice finally seeing kids outside again. When walking the dog I feel like I haven’t seen kids doing kids stuff since like forever

  • Step 1

    • Demolish all housing - everyone is homeless now

    Step 2

    • Mandate that everyone design their own silly costume - this is all you’re allowed to wear

    Step 3

    • Legalize and subsidize all the fun drugs - everyone gets a weekly allowance of shrooms, ecstasy, etc

    Step 4

    • Loneliness is officially replaced with several other problems
  • Waldelfe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just force everybody to interact. Obligatory meetings for the whole village/city district/city block (depending on size of population) every saturday morning with local news, coffee and cake and maybe games or time for chatting.

  • FireAtWill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The reason there were mountain men in the old days is that they appreciated nature and they didn’t feel alone though they often were. It’s not that hard to rekindle that feeling you only have to work at it a little. I was taking walks in the woods back when I was in grade school and I seldom feel alone though it’s harder to feel like that in a city.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think there is a solution. I think this is the path and these are the results.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    a government dating app that has no algorythm, no payment, punishes mass scrollers, and has a ton of admins who actually ban the idiots out. we have the technology, but its all enshitificated.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This would work approximately as well as all the current apps. The people you want to date are either already in relationships, date without using the apps, aren’t dating right now, or simply don’t want to date you because you aren’t their type or aren’t good enough for them. The idea that the evil corporations know exactly who your perfect match is and are keeping them from you is a fantasy. The fact is, dating apps don’t work for most people because most people don’t put the effort in to present themselves well and put themselves out there.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know man, i think the simpler answer of “capitalism and profit motive create incentives that don’t yield good outcomes” is compelling. Okcupid was better and more feature rich before Match bought it.

        There is some user error on the apps, though, as you say.

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I suppose this is a difference of opinion we are just going to have.

          But in my experience, it is entirely possible to use the apps as they are with a lot of success if you put the work into having a good profile.