• jcarax@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup, no way I’m enabling play services and installing Messages just to use RCS. I mostly use Signal, anyway.

      What we should really be fighting for is more federation between messaging platforms.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Federation can be hard since you also need to protect privacy

        With that bring said they could at least try.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Means nothing to me until there is an open source option for RCS. It is supposed to be an open standard, but in reality Google has a total stranglehold on the technology.

  • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Better then ever” is a bold claim. I switched to GrapheneOS and guess what it stopped working. Why? Because Google decided not to make it work on custom OS’s anymore like a year ago.

    To my understanding there is NO real technical reason for this. If I can have Signal work cross platform (a real secure messenger) then RCS can as well.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There is no technical reason. The carriers/cellular industry gave up on their efforts to push RCS and let Google own it all for the most part, and with it, everyone lost openness.

      It’s also why Samsung Messages is on a slow burn EOL. The Samsung/Google partnership had Google encourage Samsung to drop their RCS support and just push Google’s app, after Google decided to sunset the openness of the messaging API. Third-party SMS apps will all slowly die. Probably also partly why Signal dropped SMS support. It was around the same time.

      Android’s weird changes are nothing but badness, and will likely get worse. Hopefully the open OS community can start focusing more energy behind alternative mobile OSes that aren’t dependent on a corporation.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fuck RCS.

    Twenty years too late for a “protocol” that is bound to hardware - something we decided was a bad idea forty years ago, and part of why TCP/IP became the standard.

    XMPP is a far better protocol, and has had all the features of RCS for 20 years.

    I will never use RCS.

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      XMPP does have something that breaks my heart: it bounds encryption to a very specific client. So forget about migrating to something else and keeping your history somehow. Which is very sad for supposedly interoperable protocol.

            • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              That’s a terrible UX. If you have a protocol independent from clients, at least the chat database backup should be standardized. It’s not.

              That means you’ll forever get stuck to one client. This is absolutely terrible for any organization.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I turned it off when it failed to failover to sms when there was no data connection.

    Are both me and the recipient online? Send RCS. Are either of us not connected? Send sms. How is that so hard?

    Otherwise RCS is just “worse SMS for people with intermittent data connectivity”.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    if you want me to turn on rcs then let it work with my google fi connected account where i can get my voicemails on the web