• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        60
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Was yours? Commenting online isn’t exactly fighting the good fight. Did you do anything to help shore up and defend anything.

        These companies face legal action from the government that was elected. A government elected who won power by spreading their shitty ideology everywhere.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s too hard to change anything, but only if it’s progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s too hard to change anything if one believes in laws, rules and the general idea of a fair justice. They don’t have this limitation.

    • Sizing2673@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is what’s fucking shitty about this

      Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

      It’s like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

      If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      They didn’t capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

      Don’t ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    More proof Rainbow Capitalism was a lie/ad campaign to take more money from queers.

    I wish I could rub this in the face of every cishet who said Rainbow Capitalism was actual progress.

  • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren’t so damn overdue. They don’t even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

    Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention ‘sex, gender, or sexual orientation’, which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Gender” means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn’t protect trans people, for example. We don’t know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don’t consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with “gender identity and expression”.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is not a legal contract, it’s a general guideline for users about what is or isn’t acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn’t matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Everyone should check out PeerTube sometime, the UX has improved a lot and there’s a decent amount of content too. I recommend installing the PeerTube Companion app. It shows a popup on YouTube if you’ve clicked on a video that is also available on PeerTube.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      How is discoverability in PeerTube? That was the sticking point for me with PeerTube as with Mastodon last time I looked. It was not easy to discover what’s out there.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Still not that great, I rely on the companion to redirect me to channels through YouTube.

        • mesa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah best we have right now is subscribing to the lemmy/piefed communities like /c/peertube and seeing what you like. For better or for worse, there is no algorithm. Moreso in peertube than others.

        • AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah this is the kicker for me and for most others. It won’t ever replace youtube until it can implement similar discoverability features and improve the onboarding process. Youtube is run by the shitlords, yes, but it’s also a service that has no equal, literally has no peers. Until it does, it will remain uncontested and they’ll be able to get away with whatever policy changes please them (and their dictator-in-chief. And their shareholders)

    • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Nebula.tv

      and

      Means.tv

      both offer more curated platforms that arent owned and operated by the broligarchy

      I realize Peertube is free and Floss but it’s esoteric and lacking buy in; like a great open source console with no games. (Whats more if you dont use a VPN it can be used to track your view history, iirc)

      I’m broke af but planning on getting subscriptions to both asap; real shit bc if the monetization model is “free” (ads) then you the viewer are the product, units for their ecomomy.

      and they’ll canibalize you when their done with queer people, brown people and other marginalized folks like me.

  • mooncake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Boycotts are performative stunts that feel good but don’t have impact on companies and even gets more attention ON those companies.

      No really, this is a phenomenon that’s known. When people were protesting Blizzard, I swear to fucking god, people I knew for years who hadn’t played WoW since they were kids suddenly decided to reactivate their accounts because all the talk about blizzard “made them nostalgic” and despite being sympathetic to the people hurt by the company, they simply didn’t have the mental value-system to draw lines between those two things. Their own desires to escape and recapture youth was far, far stronger than the social messaging they honestly just felt was finger-wagging and parental scolding, so they rejected the idea of protesting without conscious thought.

      And there are far, FAR more people like this than there are people with steadfast principles and discipline to stick to them. The depressing majority of people are not really thinking, they’re just going with the flow, agreeing with popular sentiment when it’s convenient, doing whatever they want when nobody is looking because capitalism has bled our axioms out.

      If we put that much energy into volunteering with groups raising funds for primaries, getting to know our neighbors and forming communities, actually talking to people in our communities, we would abolish this fascist empire in a single election cycle. (Assuming we have elections again.)

      edit: I firmly stand by my claim that you can change the world a lot better by being a good, active, social person who organizes your community. If we all kinda, embraced this as a passion and cared about people who aren’t in our discord servers, we wouldn’t need to try to boycott companies who won’t give two shits about you giving them more press.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Boycotts are performative stunts that feel good but don’t have impact on companies and even gets more attention ON those companies.

        No they aren’t? People just haven’t actually been pissed off enough to actually wield the weapon of “ok, fine, now I will not buy ANYTHING from you”.

        Boycotts most definitely work, Tesla’s stock is plummeting, and one of the major reasons is an aggressive and enthusiastic boycott of buying Telsas (also they suck).

        This isn’t to say in any given situation a boycott is the best strategy to use, or that your organizing energy isn’t better spent elsewhere, but don’t dismiss boycotts when we are seeing one of the most effective high profile ones in recent memeory be VERY successful.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Strikes do a lot more damage to companies. I think a lot of people mix the two ideas up.

          The last most successful boycotts were mostly ones you never heard of, and at least one you rather not hear of. We managed to get tuna companies to pretend to harm fewer dolphins in 1988. Before that is was things like the 1965 Delano Grape Strike and the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycott. The most recent boycott that actually got a company to change its marketing and outreach was the Bud Lite/Dylan Mulvaney boycott by the anti-trans right.

          If you think you can get enough people as worked up about an issue as the chuds were about a single commercial featuring someone they were scared of, then by all means let’s fire up all the engines and get boycotting. Otherwise, I would encourage people who work at these tech companies to start talking about unions and making change from the inside. But none of that does as much damage to a company as getting politicians installed who are already taking bribes from other companies. Yes this is a dark perspective, you’re welcome to disagree but in my nearly five decades on Earth this is just what I’ve seen over and over.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I don’t want to take away from the general thrust of your point, I just don’t think we have actually seen boycotts that people were actually fired up en masse to enforce.

            I think up until right this very moment the general center of mass of society has been largely ok with most of what capitalism is, I think that is going to continue to drastically change, and we will see a lot more wildcat boycotts of companies that significantly hurt them.

            That being said I agree that overly focusing on that as a strategy isn’t necessarily wise, but boycotts are definitely a weapon that can absolutely blow up the bridges of corporate 'Murica.

        • Letsdothisok@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, this boycott at least isn’t “working” to any serious degree. And teslas stock is negligibley effected by any the protest. It can all be so subjective, though, anyway.

          Lol, no, i looked it up, this is not a “VERY” successful boycott. Not in the least.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Boycotts are not enough, but in combination with girlcotts they are very efficient.

        I’ll see myself out.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    youtube has enshittified for a while, they went downhill as soon as they announced that they no longer backed election denial reports. then all the right wing, anti-woke videos started popping up all over the place, plus the one that try to seem like its both sides videos too.

    allowing people like beast, and others to dominate the front, was asking for trouble.

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    They don’t want proof that what’s going to be happening soon, was ever mortally objectionable.