HEISENBERG@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoPope suggests blessings for same-sex unions possible in response to 5 conservative cardinalsapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down18
arrow-up1240arrow-down1external-linkPope suggests blessings for same-sex unions possible in response to 5 conservative cardinalsapnews.comHEISENBERG@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·1 year agoWHY is Carholicism not banned in every western society?
minus-squareBig Miku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoBecause of those pesky human rights that mandate “freedom of religion” or whatever.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoFreedom to veleive in whatever god or none that you want to…not freedom to control our fucking government with it.
minus-squareBig Miku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI mean it kinda does with the whole “freedom of expression” thing it has. I could be wrong on this, but that’s how I interperted it.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoWait wait wait are you saying that the Constitution gives authority to religions to exert control over others who do not accept that religion?
minus-squareBig Miku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo clue about the constitution, since I am not american, but it would be logical to think that the religous can rule as long as they don’t break other human rights.
WHY is Carholicism not banned in every western society?
Because of those pesky human rights that mandate “freedom of religion” or whatever.
Freedom to veleive in whatever god or none that you want to…not freedom to control our fucking government with it.
I mean it kinda does with the whole “freedom of expression” thing it has.
I could be wrong on this, but that’s how I interperted it.
Wait wait wait are you saying that the Constitution gives authority to religions to exert control over others who do not accept that religion?
No clue about the constitution, since I am not american, but it would be logical to think that the religous can rule as long as they don’t break other human rights.