• Big Miku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean it kinda does with the whole “freedom of expression” thing it has.

    I could be wrong on this, but that’s how I interperted it.

    • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait wait wait are you saying that the Constitution gives authority to religions to exert control over others who do not accept that religion?

      • Big Miku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No clue about the constitution, since I am not american, but it would be logical to think that the religous can rule as long as they don’t break other human rights.