cows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前Thinkpad for the winfeddit.orgimagemessage-square151linkfedilinkarrow-up11.54Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.53Karrow-down1imageThinkpad for the winfeddit.orgcows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square151linkfedilink
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 个月前the x131e is definitely not professional grade
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 个月前No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前The L series is the economical line. Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 个月前nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.
the x131e is definitely not professional grade
No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
The L series is the economical line.
Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.