• frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t appreciate your condescending tone telling me that I don’t know what the words I use to describe myself mean. You can kindly fuck off with your misplaced elitism.

        • 0nix_Zer0@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          No, like, you don’t know what that word means, dude, being a socialist is quite literally antithetical to being a liberal, what the fuck are you on about???

            • 0nix_Zer0@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Liberals are capitalists, conservatives are, economically, liberals.

              I’m flabbergasted, Americans really don’t know what liberal means lmao. Pull up Wikipedia dude.

              • frostysauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Interesting. You sound like an American on Reddit confidently telling someone, “That’s not a chicken burger, it’s a chicken sandwich!” Different countries and groups can have different words for things.

    • sean@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Do you wish to end capitalism? If your answer is no, you are, in fact, a liberal—completely agree

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are a bunch of folks in some of the skeevier corners of the fediverse that think Liberalism means Capitalism, which does have some truth as the ability to own and sell goods would be a right Liberalism might protect, which they in turn view as the source of all evil.

      Nevermind the fact that their political ideal has no real world equivalent aside from maybe Bhutan where the vast majority of people live like medieval peasants and their entire system of government exists to enrich a few elite off of the world’s most expensive tourism.

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yes, we typically consider liberalism (you all may know it as classical liberalism as well, it, too, counts as liberalism) equivalent to capitalism

        We (I’m speaking for anarchists and socialists) are leftists. This is what we stand against: Capitalism and the ownership of the means of production being held by the owner/capitalist class. We wish property to be held by the working class—the laborers. We are socialists. This means property goes bye bye—Property is Theft!! (thank you Pierre Jospeh Proudhon :)This is the socialist ideal, it is incompatible with liberalism and its capitalist necessities. It’s this thinking that makes liberals and tankies hate anarchist socialists—we go against the order they seek. They, too, realize it’s incompatibilities.