McDonald’s has some beef with today’s largest meat packers.

The fast food giant is suing the U.S. meat industry’s “Big Four” — Tyson, JBS, Cargill and National Beef Packing Company — and their subsidiaries, alleging a price fixing scheme for beef specifically. In a federal complaint, filed Friday in New York, McDonald’s accused the companies of anticompetitive measures such as collectively limiting supply to boost prices and charge “illegally inflated” amounts.

This collusion caused the beef market to become “a monopoly in which direct purchasers were forced to buy at prices dictated by (the meat packers),” McDonald’s suit reads — later noting that the injury it has sustained as one of those buyers is what “antitrust laws were designed to prevent.”

McDonald’s alleges that the meat packers’ conspiracy dates back nearly a decade, at least as early as January 2015, and continues today. Its suit argues these companies’ actions violate the Sherman Act, a federal antitrust law.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can we sue McDonald for all that they did to artificially decrease the cost of beef, and the immense harm that was done to the climate as a result?

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          1 month ago

          Drag doesn’t eat drag’s friends unless they’re into vore, and drag doesn’t think cows can consent to sex with drag, so no vore for the cows.

          • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Uhhh cows not being able to consent is the only reason you aren’t banging them? How the fuck do I unread something? Why speak in 3rd person? Lots of questions

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Drag seems to be a roleplayer and if you look at drag’s profile, drag’s pronouns are the same in 1st 2nd and 3rd person.

              Though I don’t know if drag realizes that means drag doesn’t need to speak in 3rd person, drag could speak in 1st person like this:

              “Drag don’t eat drag’s friends unless they’re into vote and drag don’t think cows can consent to sex with drag, so no vore for the cows”

              Replacing I/me with drag, as drag’s profile says is proper for first person.

              Now whether drag is roleplaying for the fun of it or trying to make some point about pronouns, I have no idea.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Drag thinks it’s disgusting that most people vore cows. It’s not right to vore something that can’t consent.