• FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was often accused of being a bot on Reddit. Not sure really why. Though to be fair, the majority of my interactions on Reddit were arguing with people that thought they knew more than I did about a field I’ve worked in for 20+ years.

    • 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair to the other side, it’s entirely possible (and even common) to have worked in a field for 20 years while learning completely incorrect things about it. Or learning nothing.

      People say things like “I’ve used a computer every day for 20 years, I think I know how it works” and then ask if they should “reboot the hard drive” and then they power cycle the monitor.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can also form very strong opinions early in your career and not know when they’re now invalid due to changes in tech/industry.

        Was getting a quote for a new heat pump and had the guy tell me they were worthless if it got too cold. There have been consumer heat pumps that work down to -15°C with very little efficiency loss for well over a decade at this point. He had just been used to them not being worth it for long enough that he “didn’t believe it”.

        • Acters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, the classic stick to their guns instead of doing a quick search to find something new even when there has been a lengthy amount of time between the last time they did initial research and now.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would get accused on being a bot when talking about specific topics. For example Ukraine war or some Chinese topic. I wonder if it’s bots calling other people bots. Muddy the waters.

      Astroturfing is rampant and is only going to get worse from here on out. Don’t trust anything you read

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get called a bot in a good portion of my comments here lol. Depending on the accuser, I’m either a Russian or Chinese bot or I assume a Biden apologist bot idk.

        I’m going with it and learning binary.

        • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hexadecimal is an easier transition from life as a human to life as a bot. 48657861646563696D616C20697320616E20656173696572207472616E736974696F6E2066726F6D206C69666520617320612068756D616E20746F206C696665206173206120626F742E

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      are you neurodivergent or is english a foreign language? for some reason those folks tend to get labeled as bots.

      • crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not the person you replied to, but I was told I sounded like an anime character. Either i am getting old for reddit, or I spent too much time on academia. I mean, the topic was about politics how else am I going to speak?!

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it SEEM like I’m neurodivergent (wtf is that anyway, why does everything need a fancy label?), or that English is a second language?

        • Astro@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Neurodivergent means anyone with a medical condition that could be seen as brain pathways either being disrupted, or gone, or rerouted. A few examples would be AD(H)D, Autism Spectrum Disorder (Including things such as Asperger’s), and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

          Edit: Changed Autism to ASD, and switched out Schizophrenia to OCD as it’s more apt for the term as a whole.

            • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Having proper diagnoses for people help them get care and treatment. It’s better than calling them all “stupid” and ignoring their struggles, which has been the case for decades.

              Most of these “fancy new labels” you’re hearing lately are just recognizing people, so they can be included in society and treated with dignity.

              • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                According to the prior explanation, they already had labels. ADHD, Autism, etc. But now it’s all lumped into “Neurodiverse” or whatever. Sounds like someone trying to impersonalize others. “oh just lump them all together”.

                • Elevator7009@kbin.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A good amount of the conditions lumped together as “neurodiverse” are either comorbid or share some traits. It’s reasonable people with these separate conditions may still want to connect with each other because of the commonalities between them. Nobody’s forgoing the words “ADHD”, “autism”, or “OCD” for the more generic “neurodiverse”, they only use “neurodiverse” in place of “people who have ADHD, autism, OCD, or [insert other conditions here]”.

            • Astro@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              In this case, it’s mainly a catch-all for folks to easily find help and or others with their conditions.

    • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was accused too. Till they saw my 11+ years of old comments, then they thought I was a sold account.

      I don’t know if it’s scary or stupid.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not sure why

      Because cornered redditors love ad-hominem attacks and “bot” and “shill” are particularly popular because they can be applied in just about any context.

    • frododouchebaggins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      arguing with people that thought they knew more than I did about a field I’ve worked in for 20+ years.

      LOL. Yea, I work in IT and have to listen to boomers tell me about their 30 years of IT experience and why I’m wrong.

      They mistake 30 year old experience that is no longer relevant with practical experience that is relevant today. It’s a subtle but important difference. In my experience, the people who have to prove themselves by telling you about how much experience they have are the least competent.

      Results will dictate how competent you are. Not how much experience you claim to have.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not how much experience you claim to have.

        Experience is worth a lot. Even idiots with a lot of experience can be very good at something. Smarter people need less experience to be good at something - but they still need it. As for changing technology - IT changes but the principles remain the same. Plus there’s a lot of soft skills that never change. Being able to talk to people, manage expectations, guide clients in the right directions, etc… That’s worth a lot more in the long term than being up to date with every new tool or framework.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My manager’s manager and I were having a heated debate about why we need documentation in the company (it was a major reason for delays in my team) and he pulled this BS on me: “I’ve been doing this job for 10 years, documentation goes stale.”

        Yeah and so does bread. Should that mean we should never bake bread? (obviously a joke, but really, so fucking what if it goes stale and we have to spend an hour a week keeping it up to date? Literally the entire team wants high level docs and he just keeps saying jUsT wRiTe gO0D CoDe or JuST rEAd tHe c0De)

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I could see your point in something like IT that changes as rapidly as it does. There are other fields out there that don’t really change much in the past 20-30 years. But good for you.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just… be careful with being smug about being newer to the field. There’s plenty of shit that no longer applies, but just as much that still does.

        For every brand new way of doing things there are multiple pieces of software, hardware, and programming libraries that are just repeated iterations on the original carrying forward the oddities from the past. I’ve lost track of how many times the solution to why something wasn’t working as expected couldn’t be found in the current documentation, but was instead a strange limitation or edge case of the tech it was built on top of, revealed by one of the greybeards on my team having come across it before.

      • focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        nah lol. as much as things change, base things i learned 20 years ago DEFINITELY still apply today. Don’t overlook old dogs.

    • Elderos@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I worked in the video game industry for over a decade and let me tell you there is nothing more infuriating than arguing with a clueless gamer who thinks everything can be solved in a few minutes with overly naive solutions. Bonus points for trying to “educate” me on my own specialization like “net code”. Why do I even bother.