• Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Look, let’s be real. Nitpicking over dictionary definitions like a grammar-Republican isn’t making anyone smarter. When you’re that obsessed with splitting hairs over precise definitions, you’re actually creating a fog of confusion. It’s like trying to explain quantum physics with a thesaurus, you end up sounding like a pretentious know-it-all instead of a clear communicator.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is “I’m trying to open people’s eyes to the truth” focusing on details and definitions.

          Then there’s “I’m a cunt and you’re an idiot” splitting of hairs that add nothing to the conversation or anyone’s thoughts on the matter.

          Guess which group you fall in. (Hint; the votes on your comment)

          • Linktank@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s no argument to be had, all soap is anti-bacterial. It’s a fact, not a position.

              • Linktank@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Loving all the kickback for stating an empirically correct statement. This platform is wild.

                • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m curious enough to continue the conversation, if only because talking about definitions is interesting. So I’m not being confrontational, I actually want to have a discussion.

                  You say that all soaps are antibacterial because the result in the end is that no bacteria remains on the hands. I see what you’re saying there. But anti-bacterial soap kills the bacteria, including the remaining ones that couldn’t be removed.

                  That’s like saying that removing a group of humans based on ethnicity from a region, without killing them, amounts to genocide. Would you say that’s genocide too?* (And I know the comparison is extreme.)

                  *I think I read somewhere that forcibly removing people from a region amounts to genocide, though. But you know what I mean…

    • Zeshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then what do people mean when they say normal soap and antibacterial soap and how does that affect what I should be using after handling raw meat or just going to the toilets etc?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Antibacterial” is somewhat of a marketing gimmick. Yeah, those have extra microbial killing chemicals, but plain soap kills plenty well enough, pops their little lipid walls.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would appear lemmy has deemed your post worthy of a dog pile because another user came along to nitpick, by accusing you of nitpicking.

      Yes folks, all soap is antibacterial, and that’s a great point to make in this thread. Plain soaps pops their cell walls quite nicely. I roll my own olive oil soaps and it’s wonderful.