• Piatro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      152
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Far right parties gaining significant popularity especially in France and Germany. It’s not great for the neo-liberal centre who created and perpetuated the economic downturn we’re all in and indicates a failure of the left to present a coherent alternative. There’s a lot to unpack about it. France has already dissolved their parliament and triggered an election because of these results.

      • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        5 months ago

        Netherlands also going great. At least the xenophobes hate Europe so much they don’t bother showing up for European elections to simply say they want less foreigners.

        • Netherlands actually didn’t change much. PVV got +5, but FvD (a worse PVV) lost 4. And the VVD (where Wilders came from originally) also lost 1, so it kinda cancels out. Same goes for the left parties which went from 9 to 8, but that seat went to a progressive center party.

          Overall very little has shifted here. And it seems at the European level the same coalition will continue too.

        • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I also saw the turnout polls for the Dutch vote. It was interesting to see that the portion of people who voted progressive in the last national elections and didn’t show up for the EU elections is smaller than the portion that voted fascist/populist.

      • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Eh, I wouldn’t say its a failure of “the left.” The problem is that American style neoliberalism has become the only game in town and any minor deviation is seen as dangerous extremism. Its easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism.

        Neo classical economics is simply “economics” or even worse “just basic economics” now. Every major media outlet going has been captured or compromised. Social media is bought and paid for by the same interests too. I mean, there’s some pockets of resistance here and there but the ultra wealthy control all the narratives.

        To me, blaming “the left” for that and calling their resistancea failure is just bizarre. Its not like the narrative has changed or is remotely hard to comprehend. Its just that people like being told what they want to hear; that they were right all along.

        They clearly prefer to be told its all those damn foreigners faults and that looking up is a waste of time.

        • Piatro@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I totally agree that neoliberal economics are essentially what we understand to be economics now. To be clear, I’m not blaming the left, I think it’s a case of they have a more difficult message to convey. To explain the problems that neoliberal economics has and to propose a solution to them is a really hard task compared with “it’s the foreigners at fault”. It’s a much clearer, more concise and seemingly solvable problem compared with “we need to overhaul the global economy”.

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sadly, I think you hit the nail right on the head there. People don’t want complicated answers to complicated questions. As you eluded to, blaming the out-group has worked since groups existed.

            Through my own fault, I think I read too deeply into the word failure lol.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Its easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism.

          Damn… it’s wild how true this is

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you like that, I can’t recommend “capitalist realism: is there no alternative?” enough. It where I stole it from, without a hint of shame.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not great for the neo-liberal centre

        Neoliberals love fascism… why wouldn’t this be great for them?

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not great for the neo-liberal centre who created and perpetuated the economic downturn we’re all in and indicates a failure of the left to present a coherent alternative

        Without intending to disagree with this statement, how is voting far-right a better proposition regarding the economy?

        • Piatro@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          So I didn’t make a statement about that. I’m making a statement about what these results might tell us, admittedly in a very simplistic way.

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            but what “coherent alternative” are the far right parties presenting? I felt that was the part of your sentence that implied some logic in voting far right

            • Piatro@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I said in another comment but basically the left have a tougher message to sell than the right. The right says that the system works but it’s the foreigners/benefit thieves/refugees stealing your money/house/jobs. That is inherently quite easy to understand without much thought or critical thinking. The left on the other hand have to tell you all about Thatcher, Reagan and neoliberalism before we even get to the point of solutions which are usually incredibly radical like changing the fundamental economic model we’ve all been operating under since the 80s. Inherent in that is a fear that the left’s solutions will take assets and wealth away from people. While the right promises that your assets, wealth and property rights are sacred and that it’s the “other” that will have their assets, wealth and rights taken away. Again, very easy-to-understand messaging for the right versus the left.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know yet but I saw “Polexit” on the Polish ballot and didn’t know if I should laugh or fucking cry