• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    7 months ago

    Imagine you are in an environment using Windows (with Recall enabled and all other spyware and advertisements on OS level), use Photoshop enabling Adobe to spy on you and play Valorant with an Anticheat system that runs all the time at highest Kernel level access to everything on your system, and use Chrome spying on you too.

    I almost vomit…

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wouldn’t it be nice to set 'em all up to want something (perhaps the glowing suitcase (soul?) from Pulp Fiction) and watch the greedy bastards fight, fight, fight…?

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wait, is this just projects stored in your online Adobe cloud account, or are they even stealing your content if you’re just using their desktop software? Because one of these is way, way worse than the other, even if neither is exactly good

    • infeeeee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The new AI features require internet, and they are running on their servers, so it should affect those as well. They have a “generative fill” “neural filters” which adds features to your image, so they definitely needs your full image to generate something.

      In cracked photoshop these tools are not working, obviously. So i guess if you use these cloud tools than you send your images directly to adobe hq.

      • grillgamesh0028@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        日本語
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I have a cracked PS install, and the generative fill works just fine for me, and its got all inbound/outbound connections blocked on my firewall.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Are you thinking of “content-aware fill”? Generative fill is, as far as I’m aware, much, much newer and uses newer generative AI. Content-aware fill is basically clever automatic clone stamping.

        • infeeeee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah I don’t use PS just help others install it, neural filters is the new one

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Thankfully I don’t do anything that requires me to have Photoshop, but if I did, I’d be explicitly blocking all outbound connections in the firewall.

      • shininghero@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I doubt that for two reasons:

        • There’s no non-admin way for an app to discern if it’s a firewall block, or a legitimate no-internet situation (i.e. didn’t purchase in-flight WiFi). It would also look really bad PR-wise if a company banned customers just because their internet went down or was otherwise spotty.

        • How would they even know? Their software can’t tattle on me if it’s been blocked from establishing a connection.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          They could require the app to connect once every 30 days or similar in order to keep functioning.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, the software knows if it has access. Like you would know if you don’t have access to their files, when trying to access. I didn’t say they could detect this reliably, just that it would violate the agreement, in which case they have the right to terminate the access.

          Maybe this is only about access to files saved on their server and not locally on your drive. In that case, this doesn’t matter to our discussion. But if they access your drive, as the previous comment suggested it silently by blocking access with a firewall, then one should be ready to get banned doing so. Maybe there is even a software installed on your machine that checks this… You wouldn’t know, because its all closed source.

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There are plenty of people who need a better editor than GIMP considering how long it’s gone without a major refresh (this isn’t a whinge it’s been over a decade). For anyone that actually cares about their sanity there’s Krita, that actually tries to build a program for professionals.

        Edit: Let alone Krita can actually be used by schools, while GIMP isn’t because of the name.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Now that can be an issue for some people (I mean secret contracts and stuff like that). I don’t use an image editor but if I did, I’d use Krita btw

    • urska@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Krita, Inkspace, Gimp. I understand those who use it professionally but not the zealots who dont/barely use it yet demand for it like their life depended on it.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you’re using it professionally, you need your Photoshop to be properly licensed.

        If you’re not using it professionally, there’s no need for proper licenses. And thus you can…acquire Photoshop in a way that doesn’t involve it calling back to Adobe’s systems.

          • micka190@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Photoshop does a lot of things in really stupid, convoluted ways. Krita also does a lot of the same things in equally stupid, convoluted ways, but different than PS so you get no benefit from knowing how its done in other software. Text editing comes to mind. Both PS and Krita feel like they were designed by drunk people when it comes to doing anything beyond writing text and picking a font/color/size.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          In the upcoming weeks or months (they are late as fuck) GIMP will release its long awaited version 3.0. This has some huge improvements, so a good opportunity to try out if when it comes. If you are coming from Photoshop, know that some of the important features will still be missing in GIMP, such as non destructive editing (it will only have a few features regarding that). Krita is more full featured in regard non destructive editing, but is focused on drawings, still capable of generic image editing.

            • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I never used Rawtherapee, seems to be a good tool too. I used Darktable years ago for couple of years when I was into photography. It’s fantastic and got better since. While the main focus is on raw editing and developing, it is also good enough for other image related editing. Darktable obviously is similar to Lightroom, for some even the better tool; I can’t compare them, never used Lightroom.

              It has fantastic masking features for every effect, meaning it would only affect what is not masked. You can draw a mask with mouse, set by complex parameters, and other ways to set this up. This extended feature landed after I stopped using Darktable daily (as I stopped photography). It’s worth wile checking out.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think they’ve already been doing this for awhile? They must be about to get caught or something. They want to use, and probably already are, your new ideas for training AI.

    • CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know historically if you scanned a bank note into Photoshop it’d give you a popup window telling you off lol

      • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        This has been a legal requirement by the government for a while, in order to combat counterfeit money. Many tools that work with images will complain about banknotes, even printers.

        Also it’s not AI based and isn’t sending your image to a server. It’s checking for certain specific anti-counterfeit details of banknotes.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think they’re having you agree to what they’ve already been doing.

        Photoshop’s newest terms of service has users agree to allow Adobe access to their active projects for the purposes of “content moderation” and other various reasons.

        They want you to give up the goods to train AI, old art is bad art to them. Also, this:

        This has caused concern among professionals, as it means Adobe would have access to projects under NDA such as logos for unannounced games or other media projects. Sam Santala, the founder of Songhorn Studios noted the language of the terms on Twitter, calling out the company’s overreach.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Like… do they just not want money from the main group of digital artists who generate money? It’s literally a meme that the best way to make money as an artist is furry porn

    • urska@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      they probably dont care, they make more money selling or lending the users data.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is why I don’t use Adobe.

    I’m so glad I saw the red flags from earlier and decided to stay far away from anything Adobe.

    Anyways, this is the new business tactic. Start stealing confidential information by somehow forcing a new ToS change or update.

  • JJLinux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I can’t bring myself to feel sorry for Adobe users, which unfortunately include my wife. Same goes for any of the other shit services out there. It takes determination and self-control to move away from all that crap, but as a person that sees himself with less self-determination than most, I was able to pull it off, so those that don’t can enjoy their hostage position.