• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Now that can be an issue for some people (I mean secret contracts and stuff like that). I don’t use an image editor but if I did, I’d use Krita btw

    • urska@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Krita, Inkspace, Gimp. I understand those who use it professionally but not the zealots who dont/barely use it yet demand for it like their life depended on it.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you’re using it professionally, you need your Photoshop to be properly licensed.

        If you’re not using it professionally, there’s no need for proper licenses. And thus you can…acquire Photoshop in a way that doesn’t involve it calling back to Adobe’s systems.

          • micka190@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Photoshop does a lot of things in really stupid, convoluted ways. Krita also does a lot of the same things in equally stupid, convoluted ways, but different than PS so you get no benefit from knowing how its done in other software. Text editing comes to mind. Both PS and Krita feel like they were designed by drunk people when it comes to doing anything beyond writing text and picking a font/color/size.