I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    What does “modern” mean? Emacs-like? Vim-like? Some other bastard system?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        So “some other bastard system” it is, then.

        That’s a shame; a GNU project should be consistently GNU-like (i.e. adopt Emacs key bindings).

        • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There’s already Emacs, Vim, Kakoune, etc for that. Nano is supposed to be the system default for non-advanced users.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            If Emacs keybindings are good enough to be the system default for Mac users, they should be good enough for anybody.

            • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a subjective take. GNU Nano has always been the default editor for so long alongside vi. But when you say that Emacs keybindings are good for Mac user - I can’t help but wonder - what type of generalization is that? Do you have a source to back this claim?

              Now, don’t get me wrong - I love Kakoune. But no one outside of the developer community will make an effort to learn atypical text editors with chords and modes.

              • Drew@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Every text field in MacOs supports Emacs keybindings, like Ctrl-a to go to beginning, ctrl-k to delete to end of line, etc

            • RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Given that Mac keybindings for “common special functions” (Open/Save/Cut/Copy/Paste/Find/etc.) use Command instead of Ctrl, leaving Ctrl effectively unused unless in combination with Command, this argument doesn’t hold much water.

              Sure, some Emacs fan at Apple decided to add Emacs shortcuts to Cocoa controls, but that was a pretty arbitrary decision since people coming from Mac OS 9 didn’t use the Ctrl key, well, ever.

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I like all editors to have as many diverse sets of keybindings as possible. Sadly most apps don’t, which is a main reason why I never bothered to properly learn emacs bindings, as I wouldn’t be able to use them anywhere else.