I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      So “some other bastard system” it is, then.

      That’s a shame; a GNU project should be consistently GNU-like (i.e. adopt Emacs key bindings).

      • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There’s already Emacs, Vim, Kakoune, etc for that. Nano is supposed to be the system default for non-advanced users.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          If Emacs keybindings are good enough to be the system default for Mac users, they should be good enough for anybody.

          • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s a subjective take. GNU Nano has always been the default editor for so long alongside vi. But when you say that Emacs keybindings are good for Mac user - I can’t help but wonder - what type of generalization is that? Do you have a source to back this claim?

            Now, don’t get me wrong - I love Kakoune. But no one outside of the developer community will make an effort to learn atypical text editors with chords and modes.

            • Drew@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Every text field in MacOs supports Emacs keybindings, like Ctrl-a to go to beginning, ctrl-k to delete to end of line, etc

          • RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Given that Mac keybindings for “common special functions” (Open/Save/Cut/Copy/Paste/Find/etc.) use Command instead of Ctrl, leaving Ctrl effectively unused unless in combination with Command, this argument doesn’t hold much water.

            Sure, some Emacs fan at Apple decided to add Emacs shortcuts to Cocoa controls, but that was a pretty arbitrary decision since people coming from Mac OS 9 didn’t use the Ctrl key, well, ever.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I like all editors to have as many diverse sets of keybindings as possible. Sadly most apps don’t, which is a main reason why I never bothered to properly learn emacs bindings, as I wouldn’t be able to use them anywhere else.