The European Commission has expressed anger over a ban on EU flags at the Eurovision Song Contest and demands explanations.

The allegations, made by several spectators who attended the Grand Final on Saturday and were told off for carrying the flags, quickly turned viral and prompted a stern rebuke from Commission Vice President Margaritis Schinas.

“Eurovision is first and foremost a celebration of European spirit, of our European diversity and talent. The EU flag is a symbol of this,” Schinas said on X on Saturday evening.

“Less than a month to the European elections, there should be no obstacles, big or small, to celebrating what unites all Europeans.”

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        According to AVROTROS, Klein “repeatedly indicated that he did not want to be filmed”, which “led to a threatening movement from Joost towards the camera”. They said: “Joost did not touch the camera woman.”

        This was backstage btw. Idk if raising your fist as a gesture against a camera, when you told them to fuck off multiple times is deserving of the kind of shit he is getting. But who knows, i wasnt there.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not wanting to be filmed backstage at an event seems pretty normal IMO as backstage is where a lot of prep work happens. It probably not safe for untrained personnel and/or might reveal things that people don’t want on camera (like costume malfunctions that are being worked out)

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Also, it was literally seconds after he had finished singing an ode to his dead dad, so a very emotionally raw moment.

            Which is why he had an agreement with everyone that he was not to be filmed at that time. An agreement that the obnoxious camera woman had agreed to prior to figuratively pissing all over it.

            • Plopp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              Obnoxious camera woman? You don’t think she had a producer in her ear telling her what to do?

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Whether someone else was telling her to or not, she was behaving obnoxiously. “Just following orders” is no excuse.

                • Plopp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  There are absolutely circumstances where I’d give someone a pass, even if what they did is poor behavior. I don’t know anything about her, but we’re talking about one of the largest TV events in Europe and there’s enormous pressure on every crew involved. You have to be a really gutsy and probably very experienced motherfucker to stop and say no to the producer in that moment when the stakes are so high. Even more so if you’re a woman.

                  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I get what you’re saying and in most cases I’d agree.

                    In this case, though, it was a clear invasion of his privacy and disrespect of him as a person.

                    To ignore his repeated requests to leave him alone in a very vulnerable moment, after you’ve already agreed to along with the rest of the press pool, is not just poor behavior. It’s abuse befitting the worst paparazzi sleazeballs.

        • Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet claims that he destroyed the camera.

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          Making people think you’re going to hit them is literally illegal, even if you don’t follow through. It’s not just a rule, it’s also a law.

          And yes , there are different jurisdictions for everything, but show me a jurisdiction that doesn’t have such a law

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Making people think you’re going to hit them is literally illegal

            That’s just your assumption. What I’ve read is that he tried to physically turn the camera away from his face and the obnoxious camera woman reported that as a threat.

            Either way, banning him from a once in a lifetime opportunity to perform at one of the biggest music events in the world is WAY out of proportion, especially as he was just defending himself from having his privacy invaded in a very emotional moment (just after singing an ode to his dead dad)

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The reason given is that “he made a threatening gesture towards a camera woman”

      This is likely just an excuse to ban him because he spoke out against israel committing Genocide delegation not answering a question, as instant disqualification is extremely disproportionate for a gesture.

      It also served as a great distraction from israel being allowed to compete.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That was Eric Saade with the scarf on the arm, but it was my first idea aswell. Or was there a separate incident with Joost Klein that i wasnt able to find?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I think you are right I might be confused. Joost Klein did speak up during a panel during Eurovision to make the israeli singer answer a question they were trying to dodge

          He also covered himself in the Dutch flag to be unrecognizable when they sat him next to israel

          I didn’t follow Eurovision too closely so I cannot confirm whether Klein spoke up against israel before Eurovision. For now I’ll correct my comment.

          The key point is that israel violated multiple rules themselves and harassed many contestants including the Irish one. So the decision to completely axe Joost for what appears to be a very minor infraction can almost not be explained by anything else that external motivations.