• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    A large threat to any sovereign nation is having a captured media by an unfriendly actor.

    Exactly. It’s a fight between Pro-Russian and Pro-Western forces over media access. The Pro-Russian forces want to shove down the Pro-Western media and vice-versa. Which side you see as “unfriendly” depends on which side you personally are on.

    • astreus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      But surely having a list of what media is captured is a good first step to stop either the pro-US or pro-Russian propaganda machines?

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I wouldn’t use “Pro US” here. We’re discussing Georgia and the E.U. is heavily involved so I think “Pro Western” is more accurate.

        Regardless of that I don’t know that a list is necessary, the tilt involved in media is normally pretty apparent. Additionally while I can’t read the law myself I’m going to guess that there’s more to this law than simple list making. I’ll have to see if I can find an English or German translation in order find out.

        Edit: As I suspected there’s a lot more to it than list making. I can’t read Georgian but if the ICNL is too be believed this legislation has a whole host of problems.

        https://www.icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/02.2023-Georgia-Draft-Foreign-Agents-Law-Summary-updated.pdf