Shhh, don’t tell the SovCits.
Shhh, don’t tell the SovCits.
US prepares to funnel more money to military industrial complex.
“I’ve got a buddy who can do the gas and the 'leccy. Super cheap.”
It turned out really well in NZ when we legalised it.
There’s even a sex workers union.
We still have our share of christofacists and prosperity grifters though, they’re just relatively politically impotent.
Anxiety?
If that tiny idiot of an amygdala in your brain thinks you’re in danger then nausea can be a symptom.
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.
I was thinking of “genus”.
That’s because it’s “little government for the rich” and “big government for the poors”.
Substitute any “in group” and “out group” respectively.
Just fill the balloon with farts.
Oh good, another “crackdown” on {insert vulnerable segment of society here}
Heaven forbid we “crackdown” on the root causes of that vulnerability.
February isn’t in summer.
Yeah, it is.
Someone left their pager in the mine and just fetched it again. Delayed message delivered.
/S
Occam’s razor indeed. Coal mines explode. Or rather, only just barely don’t explode all the time.
I still double-check my CIDR’s/netmasks and expected ranges with a tool (some online one or other). Easier to avoid silly mistakes or typo’s
TL;DR: it depends entirely on the DHCP server software.
Generally the safe/reliable policy is to assign a smaller DHCP range (or ranges) and allocate static assignments outside of the DHCP range(s).
Assume your network is 192.168.1.0/24.
Specify 192.168.1.128/25 for DHCP, which means all DHCP addresses will be above 192.168.1.128.
This leaves you everything below 192.168.1.127 for static assignments.
Ad hominem -> block.
Another bullshit passive-voice headline. Written implying the fault was not with the LAPD.
“LAPD officers destroy MRI machine in bungled pot raid”