For me personally, I want to limit interactions with my phone by
reading notifications on my wristincreasing interactions with my watch
That just sounds like interactions with your phone but with extra steps.
For me personally, I want to limit interactions with my phone by
reading notifications on my wristincreasing interactions with my watch
That just sounds like interactions with your phone but with extra steps.
Hey, man. You dropped this: 👑
“Line go up” is the animating force of the
agethe rich and powerful, the critical philosophical principal around whichour entire societytheir livesisare arranged.
I choose not to confuse their values as mine or that of my community.
I think the refund feature is not intended for testing any game and getting money back.
This is the first sentence from the Steam Refunds Policy page: https://store.steampowered.com/steam_refunds
You can request a refund for nearly any purchase on Steam—for any reason.
You’re using the New York Times to support the idea that the New York Times didn’t support the war.
What do you think could be an issue with using that evidence?
Edit: I find it amusing that the article you shared is partially blocked (censored) unless I sign up to the NYT.
These sources show that the New York Times supported the war because it poorly reported the idea that Iraq had WMDs. The NYT did not do its due dilligence, intentionally mislead the public, or a mix of factors.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-new-york-times-wmd-coverage
https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/the-new-york-times-role-in-promoting-war-on-iraq-20040323-gdilbl.html
I understand where you’re coming from: If natural dialogue is preferred for a creative work, then having laughter audio is inappropriate.
I disagree that canned laughter and live audience laughter are equivalent.
With live audience reactions it’s like watching a theatre presentation, you get to be part of the crowd. We get a chance to laugh at the jokes at a natural pace (allowing for pauses so we don’t miss the next joke) that the audience would set, and their reactions are modulated organically.
Canned laughter doesn’t do this, it doesn’t set a natural pace. It is calculated by an audio engineer, and the laughter will be an unnatural reaction to the joke presented.
It’s the difference between a genuine and forced smile. We can naturally sense something is off. A live audience reaction is superior to canned laughter in most cases.
That being said, some shows don’t need laughter audio to be enjoyable.
The IT Crowd didn’t use canned laugh tracks, They recorded audio of audience responses.
They pay out of initial capital investment and leveraging.
How does pirating make a corporation broke? Making a copy doesn’t steal money.
Edit: We can’t pirate a company into bankruptcy.
Up and down votes are not a “agree / disagree” button. They are for dis/encouraging posts. You can upvote a post you disagree with but can see that it is useful for the discussion.
Removed by mod
The most likely scenario is that the person with first-hand knowledge misinterpreted the situation.
Exactly. Which is why I started with questions so you could explain more. That’s how a conversation works and prevents it from getting toxic.
These poor men and their sensitive feelings…
Case and point.
What year is it? This has been true for over a decade.
Removed by mod
“Depeche mode”?
OOTL: Oh, it’s a band.
Better. I’d rather work with reality than endlessly chase fantasies which I’ll never reach.
Unfortunately that is how the human body works. Our sleep/wake cycle can only naturally drift by about an hour a day. It isn’t entirely dependent on how you feel.
Yeah, he already covered “poorly aimed or not aimed at all.”