Russian President Vladimir Putin can choose not to hold presidential elections next year because he will “obviously” win re-election, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said late Sunday.

  • The one and only@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That he will win them is indeed obvious. Since there have not been fair elections in Russia for quite some time, one cannot expect these to be fair.

      • Specific_Skunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey now, windows and balconies were doing the heavy lifting (dropping?) earlier this year. Must have been a shortage in poison due to the embargos.

    • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not having elections would make it more transparent to what is going on though. It should not be in Putin’s favour to just stop having them. Maybe he can’t afford the bill of having one this time.

    • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised he waited so long, honestly. all this tip-toeing around rigged elections and shoving his political opponents out of windows into cups of polonium tea is lot of work for a guy who has to shop for gigantic conference tables all day and poop into a collection bag for his secret service guys to catalogue for whatever reason. when you combine all of that with his busy schedule of genociding Ukranians, well… obviously, one of those activities will to have to go. an evil autarch has only so much time in the day!

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO we’re more likely to see Russia break into a pile of separate republics than a big unified uprising. Maybe that pile of republics gets unified by a new dictator or Putin, maybe not. As it is, the core Russian ethnic group is shrinking while several of the other ethnicities are growing within their respective regions.

      Eventually the Russians won’t have enough young men to conscript and continue maintaining control of their already massive territory, which will lead to existing regional governments declaring independence while Russia proper will be able to do fuck all about it unless they wanna start nuking their neighbors.

      • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russia break into a pile of separate republic is practically impossible, as it will cause colossal pain for literally all states. It is much easier to negotiate with one dictator with a nuclear button than with twenty.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Look, I’m not arguing what I think makes sense for people to do, I’m thinking about how people in large groups tend to act, regardless of whether it’s logical. Competing for power is inevitable whenever a centralized system can’t maintain outright dominance.

            • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes yes. The evil Putin has usurped all power alone and is standing up to the entire government like a real Russian. And he probably shot Nemtsov personally.

              In fact, there are many interested forces in the government. People for war, people against war, people who don’t care. Everything is like everywhere else.

              Prigozhin went on his march because Putin tried to legally ban Wagner by transferring all financial flows to the army. Prigozhin received the money and quietly left. probably literally everyone knows this. how fashionable it is to believe in the image of a strong old man is a mystery to me.

          • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            then you don’t quite understand how the Russian economy works. The regions do not have their own economic system and their own army either. Both money and people pass through Moscow. how to find resources for the collapse in such conditions is unclear to me. If only you believe in the people in a single impulse organizing their own government. This is also very unlikely.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    > Russian President Vladimir Putin can choose not to hold presidential elections next year because he will “obviously” win re-election, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said late Sunday.

    I agree, why even bother?

    If the russian population is eating the bullshit thrown before them, why hold elections… Save yourself the hassle and stop pretend to be a democracy.

    And yeah, I imagine the TRUMP-MAGA-GOP is cumming right in their pants without even touching when Putin actually just calls of the elections.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    > Putin is widely expected to declare his bid for a sixth overall presidential term.

    Oh, his “bid”? Is he gonna roll those dice one more time? See if he breaks lucky?

    • cpo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      A “bid” would entail something like “chance”. And that chance would not depend on the citizens, but on his cronies…

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, what happened with not serving more than 2 consecutive terms in Russia? Was it already removed?

    • WtfEvenIsExistence3️@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well you can always serve a term as prime minister, then be president again. Just make a small tweak of the office of Prime Minister to being the most powerful position, then when you are ready to be president again, change the most powerful position back to the office of presidency. No violation of consitution, just convienient changes on which office has the actual power.

      • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        By the way, this was corrected in the amendments to the constitution 6 years ago. Just when Putin went for a new term “because the constitution was changed, which means it’s like zeroing out the terms”. If you interesting.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, in 2020 he did make it law that he was dictator for life. So, what’s the point of going through the motions anymore?

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t feel bad for the Russian people.

    They deserve this shit for putting up with this year after year as they could clearly see him grabbing more and more power. If they revolted against him 10 or even 15 years ago when he had a fraction of the power that he does now, it never would have gotten so bad and this pointless war in Ukraine might have never happened.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “It’s the abusee’s fault for putting up with them”.

      • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is when you’re talking about a nation. Putin rules by consent of the governed, they can revoke it