It is not enough. And if you’re reading just 200, than you’re not reading correctly.

Again, 200 was the number during the temporary seize fire.

I never argued about people buying and sending in food aid, and you’re obviously writing that to try and distract from the point.

You’re also trying to sidestep the 2000 number with the:

Don’t know if it’s enough but it seemed to be the last few years.

comment. You should know. You should know that it isn’t enough based on the population numbers that we seem to agree on, and the statement you made earlier about the arid conditions. (That’s part of the issue with the peace process. Funny how most of the water sources ended up on the other side of the wall. Why would anyone agree to peace when they won’t have water?) You should know that 200 isn’t enough in the same way that you should know that the sky is blue on a sunny day.

How do you not comprehend that this:

Isreal looks at these shipments to make sure they don’t contain material or weapons that could be used against them.

is a lie when Israel openly boasts about putting the Gazan population on a starvation diet. That is because they don’t allow **FOOD ** in. Food is not a weapon. Do you think food is a weapon?

Finally:

I don’t accept the premise of your question, as it assumes facts not in evidence. But, if I read it plainly, of course not.

is not an answer. I’m not asking you to state Israel is committing genocide.

First I want you to admit that a group not allowing enough food for a population is trying to kill off a portion of that population.

There are no facts assumed there.

The facts tying Israels actions, along with citations proving that that is happening, comes later.

So, do you think a government (any government) intentionally withholding food, potable water, and medicine from a population it considers undesirable (Any undesirable population) is committing genocide?