• bluerabbit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 years ago

    Just curious - I have no interest in giving QAnon conspiracies more oxygen - but on what basis were they banned? Being disastrously misinformed, on its own, does not appear to be against the Code of Conduct (and nor should it be).

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Spreading such misinformation without full knowledge of a subject, and hearing all sides of arguments, does violate the policies here I think. And it seems to be working, keeping those hive minded Redditors or Facebook-tier users away.

      • bluerabbit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 years ago

        I can’t see anything in the text that would disallow that other than “mod doesn’t like it” - if so, it’s rather similar to what Reddit’s being accused of in this post. So far my experience is that opinions on this Lemmy federation are even more homogeneous than they are on Reddit - the prevailing view is just different. Again, this post has been a good example. It’s all a little disappointing.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Do you want the prevailing view to be discriminatory, filled with racism hatred and fanboyism, or do you want objectivity without hatred? It becomes that choice.

          If objectivity and less /pol/ junk means prevailing view, then I support it.