Banning marijuana growing at home, increasing the substance’s tax rate and altering how those taxes get distributed are among vast changes Ohio Senate Republicans proposed Monday to a marijuana legalization measure approved by voters last month.
The changes emerged suddenly in committee just days before the new law is set to take effect, though their fate in the full Senate and the GOP-led House is still unclear.
The ballot measure, dubbed Issue 2, passed on the Nov. 7 election with 57 percent of the vote and it set to become law this Thursday, making Ohio the 24th state to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use. But as a citizen-initiated statute, the Legislature is free to make tweaks on it, of which they’re attempting plenty.
Wait, you complained about me being focused on healthcare, but you still want to talk about it?
Well. “Obamacare” ended up being a more conservative version of Mitt Romeny’s plan.
But if we’re only giving credit for what’s done (and I agree with that) then suddenly all the things that make neoliberals better than Republicans disappears.
I mean, the only recent expansion of healthcare by either party was when Dems passed the more conservative version of Romney’s plan
You’re making my point, the letter by someone’s name doesn’t mean much when majorities of politicians from both parties oppose progresss
There’s just some with a D by their name that try, but progressives are still a minority in their own party unfortunately
Edit:
Actually with a profile blurb like that, I don’t think any exchange will ever be productive…
I’m just going to use the block button, feel free to keep responding, I’ll never see it.
Just don’t have time for sovereign citizens who openly call for execution of politicians, even if they’re terrible politicians…
I think you’re doing that thing where people believe the right position is always halfway between D and R
Do you even know what neoliberals are?
You’ve made it clear that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m sure you’re referring to #ExecuteTrump. Which is a reference to his own penchant for calling for the execution of his political enemies, under the cover of calling it “political speech.” If he can do it, so can I.