• dumdum666@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think my point still stands for both cases (even though it was originally directed at startups): if a US company considers a startup or an decades old hidden champion somehow valuable, they will buy that company. They just pay the original owners a shitton of money.

    • sic_1@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      How will they buy a family owned private company? That would require the family willing to sell and that’s simply not the case 95% of the time.

      The real problem is that those hidden champions can not grow further because they already dominate their small niche. Often they inhabited this position for generations already and are very conservative and don’t really innovate.

      • dumdum666@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This wouldn’t happen by force - they would just offer a lot of money to convince them. I never claimed that those transactions would always be successful, did I?

          • dumdum666@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            you claim them to happen at relevant scale,when they dont.

            Where have I claimed that there were large scale buyout programs like you falsely suggest?

            so shifting the goalposts to “well it happens sometimes” is silly.

            I didn’t shift the goalposts- you purposefully want to misunderstand- there is a difference.