• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    it has a ton of vulnerabilities because it’s not a safe file format

    Its a high compression image file, ffs. If someone sends you a 10 mb .webp file, that should be setting off alarm bells right off the bat. Even then, I have to ask what the hell your Windows Viewer app thinks it should be allowed to do with the file shy of rendering it into pixels on the screen.

    • propaganja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it sounds like you’re saying, “I don’t know how it can be dangerous, therefore it’s not dangerous.”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        All I’m hearing is that “its not safe” without further details. And given the utility relative to .jpeg, I’d like more on the table than just “Don’t do it! Unsafe!”

        • propaganja@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree the claim requires more evidence and it would be foolish to just take it at face value, but even if my intuition told me it was intrinsically safe I wouldn’t place any degree of trust in my own logical conclusions, or discount someone else’s warnings, however spurious.

          The burden of proof should never be on the accuser when it comes to safety, in my opinion, or anything else of public concern. And the standard of proof should be higher to show that everything’s ok than to show that it’s not. At least in an ideal world.