• kaboom36@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been on this instance for a about a month now, and I’ve not seen anything remotely like that

    It would not shock me in the least if the reason this instance was put on that list was because of one of those “all weebs are pedos” jerks

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember when a bunch of instances banned nsfwlemmy because they allegedly allowed pedo content, when in truth they just decided to not moderate fictional characters where the age was not obvious (like potentially 18, but plus / minus a couple years)?

      I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues instead of chasing ghosts, because that instance is a toxic cesspool of assholes and disinformation.

      • cacheson@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

        As much as I would love to see it, I don’t think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s how it was originally. They spun lemmygrad off to an entirely different serve because they made a halfhearted attempt at going mainstream, which seems to have lasted about 5 minutes

  • Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    allegedly

    A bit weird that they didnt want proof of misconduct, but hey

    • Callie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t they use allegedly in the same way that news orgs use it? It’s lack of accountability if they get sued

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It kind of cuts both ways, though. If you want to actually punish something for doing something, “allegedly” doesn’t really cut it.

        Hey, I allege that lemmygrad has tons of Loli porn on it! No need to check, I’m alleging it. Guess it needs to be blacklisted now too?

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks like ani.social they have a rule to forbid the content though might have just been posts that weren’t reported

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ml seems to be coming a bit unwound. They have been super ban happy lately but enforce the rules very unevenly. Hexbears can post pig shit gifs, but citing mainstream political science gets you banned pretty reliably if you do it under the wrong gaze. It really is starting to look more and more like fediverse cancer.