• Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Welcome to the anthropocene extinction event; it’s been going on for a while, but it’s only going to get worse

  • TingoTenga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nice, long article for doom scrolling. Highly recommended.

    Three-hundred-million years ago, the planet repeatedly lost control of its carbon cycle and suffered 90m years of mass extinctions, including two of the biggest global catastrophes of all time – both CO2-driven nightmares. In one case, it nearly died. It was felled, in the words of the palaeontologist Paul Wignall, by “a climate of unparalleled malevolence”. At the very end of the Permian period (252m years ago), enough lava erupted out of Siberia and intruded into the crust that it could have covered the lower 48 US states a kilometre deep.

    A kilometre deep.

    (,) the best estimate is that we’re emitting carbon perhaps 10 times faster than even the mindless, undirected Siberian volcanoes that brought about the worst mass extinction ever.

  • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Keep churning out the CO2 and the plastic. All that matters is the next quarterly earnings report and shareholder satisfaction.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s happening lightning fast relative to other mass extinction events on the geological timescale

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      That graph has a really optimistic looking downturn on fossil fuels as a percentage of energy production … until you look at the labels on the y axis. Dropping most of the way would be a damn huge improvement. Dropping from 80 to 75 is a nice improvement but too little too late unless we speed it up.

      I’m calling lying by statistics

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is also meaningless as fossil fuels are growing, just not as fast as renewables and nuclear are. Things are getting decidedly worse as all the clean energy coming on line is only supplementing fossil fuel use, it is not displacing any of it.

        Shit getting wild and is going to get wilder.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Moving 5% of fossil energy to renewables in a year is absolutely massive

        If you look at Wikipedia articles about photovoltaics growth, you’ll see 25-27% growth per year. Compounding. This is insane rate.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes 5% is still big but we needed it a decade ago. We’re running late and need to make up for lost opportunity

          …… and I live in a country that seems determined to reclaim our place as the top polluter, and to throw away any hope of building for the future

          • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            and I live in a country that seems determined to reclaim our place as the top polluter

            If you mean the Trumps policy “Drill Baby Drill”, then let me tell you this: Trump is pissing against the wind. Oil extraction will only get more expensive while solar power will only get cheaper.

            No matter what he does, the economy will push towards cheaper energy source.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              While I agree on the basic economics and even taco can’t hold back time…

              • he can and has slowed down EV adoption
              • he can and has slowed down buildout of renewables, costing thousands of jobs
              • his lack of enforcement certainly means some polluter will pollute more
              • if he succeeds in permanently neutering EPA, we’ll all suffer for a generation
              • he can and has blocked renewables, battery, EV manufacturing in the US
              • he can and has invented automakers to backtrack to yesterdays technology, leaving them with a precarious future unable to compete that will potentially cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and a regional economic base