• tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I suspect the person you responded to understood the context, but was cheekily calling out the “technically incorrect” usage of ±

        The ± symbol requires a tolerance value to create a defined maximum and minimum range, e.g 300±20 (so Soran could be anything between 280 and 320)

        it doesn’t mean “approximately”

        But I understand this is just an inconsequential funny picture, so whatever right.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          it doesn’t mean “approximately”

          They should have wrote ~300 if they wanted approximately 300.

          • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Well, that part at least I don’t think is necessary. It’s a parody of a dating app, and it seems from searching screenshots the real app doesn’t have units either - just the number.

            Which is just fine, because the number next to someone’s name being their age is clear from context.