Fuck the stupid morons who defend Apple.

Imagine if Microsoft banned Windows users from installing the software they want on their computer.

Imagine if Microsoft required all software developers to give them 30% of their earning or Microsoft will ban them from Windows

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Hating on Apple for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Google for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Microfot, Sony, and Nintendo for their cuts is popular.

    But somehow hating on Steam for their 30% cut is going too far.

    • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The difference is availability of choice. On apple phones, Xbox, Nintendo, and PlayStation you are locked into a single source of software. On a PC there are myriad of game stores you can choose from. Sometimes you can even buy the software directly from the developer. Usually people are upset when this choice is taken away (for example epic exclusive games). Nobody would bat an eye if a developer offered their game on epic or their own platform with a ~20% discount compared to steam. But it is up to the developers to make their game available on any of the PC game stores.

      In conclusion, steam is not a platform holder, they could charge whatever they wanted. If the markup was too high, you could simply choose to buy your games elsewhere. For most people, this 30% is worth it for the features and buyer protection that steam offers compared to other platforms.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d like to see a game developer chiming in but as a user, 30% cut by Steam feels justified.

      They have helped me discover and buy many games that I wouldn’t have even heard of otherwise. Compare that to Google Play Store which is full of dogshit shovelware and Pay2Win games.

      And sometimes I’ve even bought Steam keys via Fanatical bundles, where I chose which games to buy by looking at their Steam store pages. Steam got nothing from these transactions as far as I know.

      This is without getting into other useful stuff like guides and forums hosted by Steam which I can look at whenever I get stuck. Or Steam workshop which allows users to easily mod the games.

      Call me a fanboy but I’m tired of this ‘what about Steam’ comments.

      Ask Sony, Microsoft, Google, and Nintendo to improve their stores instead.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I get why people like steam. But as a steam hater, if GabeN ever dies and the kids or whoever is heirs are decide to sell to VCs or private equity. That 30% will be just as oppressive as anyone else’s.

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I agree that the 30% cut is too much. The only reason I give them a pass is because Steam is really good (at least, as a user). But I still want them to lower it.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        For a dev those 30% are very much worth it because Steam has tons of customers and very good recommendation algorithms, you gain more in additional sales than what you lose from the cut. Could they do with less probably but they’re not extorting devs. There’s a reason why Epic had to do stuff like guarantee sales and provide huge advances to get anyone onto their excuse for a platform.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Steam is not the only means of distribution anywhere, and you can often buy the same game both from Steam and directly.

      It’s too early to hate it.

      (Well, I mean, I want a FreeBSD native Steam client with native Proton and all infrastructure, but I can understand that it’s a small percentage, even if not that different from Linux support.)

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It would be more comparable if Apple, Microsoft (Xbox), Nintendo, or Sony allowed anyone to make a third party game launcher but they just keep sucking.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You get value from Steam for paying that.

      What value do you get from Apple for paying the Apple tax? A higher price for a phone that could cost 500€ less?

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What exactly is the value that steam provides with its 30% cut that Apple doesn’t provide? Not defending Apple by the way.

        Openness of the hardware is a valid point but that isn’t exactly a feature of steam (nor a distinction between the other platforms in OPs comment)

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Apple forces me to stay there.
          Valve offers me to stay there. The whole market and review system is incredibly important as I can see if it’s even worth it to buy. Where else can you see reviews besides comparing numerous comments under video reviews?

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m less mad at Steam and Google because there are clear, simple ways to avoid their cuts.

      I have no basis to say whether they’re providing a service worth the 30% charge. I’m also less mad at Steam than at Google because they’re being less shady about trying to push people into their store too.

    • symbolic@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Perhaps that’s because Steam doesn’t seem to be trying very hard to “lock in” developers to their platform. Devs are free to sell their PC games on Gog or Epic or whatever. Steam is popular because it’s a good platform. This freedom for developers or customers mostly does not exist on mobile or on consoles, except for the EUs efforts here.

      Even their “console” the Steam Deck can, relatively easily, run games from other stores. I’m not saying a 30% cut should be considered fair but they do seem to take a different approach to digital sales than the other large players.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah it’s arguable that Steam is a monopoly but somehow billion dollar publishers can’t create a store to sell their own products without fucking it up with annoying bullshit. Pay the 30% to protect you from yourselves.

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, Steam is pretty much a monopoly. But I haven’t seen what I’d call monopolistic practices from them. It’s just that everyone else appears to fall flat on their faces when trying to make a competing product.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Valve is a private company owned by someone who is passionate about games and so unlike other companies with investors, they leave short term money on the table to make the best product for gamers. If its ownership model ever changes it will speedrun enshittification for the same reason other storefronts suck

          • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s weird because steam isn’t even that amazing at what it does and even some of the features I like can be tempremental or downright buggy at times.

            • raptore39@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Once I saw the power of Steam on Linux, I knew no other company could touch them.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When you’re in a monopolistic position you don’t need to do much for people to decide to sell in your store instead of going for alternatives, who would have thought?

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Steam is equally shitty, they just have the advantage of not being publicly traded which means they can create long term strategies and execute them successfully.

        Doesn’t mean they’re pro consumer.

        • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Would not say equally shitty, otherwise they won’t have popular support they do.

          You are correct however that they are not pro consumer.

          They are just a smarter, wiser business with a sustainable business model that understands the importance of consumer trust.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You can find popular support for plenty of shitty things. I could point 70m people in the US supporting a very shitty thing!

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                And you think stupidity is exclusive to the US? Italy elected a fascist, Germany’s far right party is gaining ground…

                Popular support for something doesn’t mean that thing is good.

    • oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Steam gets a pass because they actually offer buyer protection, refunds if it doesn’t work, refunds under certain requirements which can be waved under certain circumstances, removal of day one season passes, refunds for dlc that gets delayed too long for example.

      If an actual competitor gave a shit about things that matter to actual players than they have a shot. Epic Game Store is a joke because no one wants a store that only focuses on what corporations want. GOG is good but just doesn’t market itself well, seriously outside of launching CDPR games I don’t see it at all.

      Getting companies to offer their games on platforms that offer a higher margin is easy. Getting players over to a platform that offers less protections and features is not going to happen.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        GOG is good but just doesn’t market itself well

        GOG’s biggest problem is also their greatest asset: no DRM.

      • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I was denied a refund for a broken game on Steam Deck just last winter. I had never played or even installed it, but I had purchased it and let it sit in my backlog too long before trying.

        By comparison, I can’t recall a single time I’ve been denied a refund request from the iPhone App Store. They’ve also never sold me software that couldn’t run on the hardware they also sold me.

        I understand how it’s my fault according to steam’s ToS, but it still doesn’t seem right to me.

    • gray@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Steam isn’t a monopoly.

      The PC is an open platform, you can use any game store or launcher you want - unlike the iPhone, Android (without sideloading), PlayStation, switch, or Xbox.

      • 7arakun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah the comments about Steam being a monopoly are weird to me. Steam has a huge market share, but they don’t own the whole market and they don’t try to prevent you from buying your games elsewhere. Proton even works on non-steam games. I’ve used it to play WoW private servers on Linux.

        If Valve isn’t a pro-consumer company, then I don’t know what company could possibly fit the criteria. They’re not perfect, but they’ve earned the trust they have. I’ll trust Valve until they give me a reason not to.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Ya, but I also installed fdroid pretty easily without the system blocking me.

    • dwazou@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Microsoft, Apple, Exxon, Meta, Amazon, JP Morgan or Saudi Aramco are the most powerful corporations in the world. They are empires more powerful than many nations. Their CEOs always travel with armed men. They have the personal phone number of Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.

      It’s healthy to scrutinize them. Steam is a problem, but Valve is nowhere near as powerful.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Steam’s 30% is the last of their problems, I would like them to finally start actually moderating Steam forums. Because devs of the particular game usually don’t care. Visit some forums of newly released popular game and it’s full of bigots, misogyny, trolls and hate. It’s unbelievable.

      Go check oblivion remastered

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Bigots, Misogyny, Trolls & Hate is translation for I want people censored because I am on a power-trip. These are vague & nebulous & why don’t you & your buddies go counter them

        & Good one mate, because I have been there.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      “Eat the rich!”

      “Including Gabe?”

      “Woooow there cowboy!”

      I hate the hypocrisy.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Gaben is a hardcore libertarian as well. And owns a billion dollar armada of yachts.

        No he’s one of the good ones /s

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Valve’s response to George Floyd was to give each employee a certain amount of money and let them choose which charity to give it to (if they did give it to charity), which means they could just as well give it to an anti BLM movement if they wanted to.