• Mchugho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not just some bloke is it? It’s an entire demographic. Our schools are failing people from the very start and they aren’t interested in social mobility or education.

    We spent £230bn on welfare last year alone. Granted a percentage of that chunk is fixed, but to act as though there is no headroom and people aren’t gaming the system ever is just insanity.

    Yes the rich need taxing, but this isn’t a mutually exclusive kind of situation. We shouldn’t just tax the rich and spend stupidly elsewhere.

    • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      When did I say people aren’t playing the system? I said it’s massively overestimated given the numbers of people that aren’t playing the system.

      And welfare spending also includes Pensions. It’s also by far and away the largest portion of that pie. Maybe we could take the state pension away from people who already have a nice cushty private pension and distribute that percentage back to people who aren’t in a position to retire at all?

      • Mchugho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you said like 15 people are abusing the system. There are millions out there and you know it.

        Yes scrap the triple lock as well, it’s a load of bollocks too.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are millions out there and you know it.

          I don’t know it. Can you show any kind of proof?

          For the record, it seems like ~10 million people aren’t working who are of working age in the UK. If it’s millions, it would mean that at least 1 in 5 people not working abuses the system. Do you really think it’s that high?

          • Mchugho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It depends how many people claiming sick you think are actually unable to work. It benefits both the claimants and government to fudge the statistics to make it seem like the long term unemployed are receiving sickness benefits.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You claimed that it’s millions. Can you show any evidence? I mean, you even claimed the other commenter knows you are right with that.

              • Mchugho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Here you go. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52660591

                Like I said before it really depends how many of the people claiming to be sick actually are unable to work. If you truly believe all of them it doesn’t look like many,but from experience I know there are plenty of people claiming sick who are able to work.