Summary

A new H5N1 bird flu variant has become “endemic in cows,” with cases detected in Nevada and Arizona, raising concerns about human transmission.

Experts warn that without intervention, the outbreak will continue, but Trump has cut CDC staff and halted flu vaccination campaigns.

The virus’s spread coincides with a severe flu season, increasing the risk of mutation.

The administration has also stopped sharing flu data with the WHO and shifted its containment strategy away from culling infected poultry, raising fears of inadequate response.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Curious about your diet, and where you get your food? Also curious how that scales to 350 million people (to feed the US)?

    I’m not remotely implying what we’re doing, as a society, is right or sustainable but it’s super easy to just say “Just stop doing bad things”.

    Solutions, at scale are quite complicated and nuanced. Private companies that grow our food at scale now will only participate if it’s profitable.

    Also, if you’re not sustainably growing your own food, are you not just like the rest of us (Part of the problem)? I know I don’t have the land, or time to grow my own food.

    Sticking our head in the sand (current administration) is definitely not gonna turn out well, so I’m guessing there’s some fun times ahead! <sigh>

    • lumpybag@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You think scaling plant based food is harder than scaling a meat industry? I’m a meat eater but come on… It is not hard to get to place mentally that humans could easily live on plant based foods. People choose to eat meat because it’s what they believe to be is delicious and what their parents raised them on.

      Maybe DOGE should cut all the subsidies the meat industry gets, upwards of $40 billion and we can see what the real price of meat should cost.

      • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Lol they aren’t trying to actually reduce expenses. If they did there’s clear places to go (we don’t seem to want to use our military, why do we spend 1/3 of our national budget on it?).

        The goal is to inject confusion and uncertainty into everyone’s lives and to pwn the libs who think government is capable of doing good.

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s not at all what I said. The meat Industry already exists and is scaled profitable, even if it’s terrible for our planet.

        I said to get any scale of another version, it’s going to have to be as equally profitable or corporations are not going to go for it.

        Sustainable, scalable and profitable.

    • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Mostly beans, wheat, and oats, in different form factors. More salads.

      Your body only requires a tiny amount of protein and that’s also the easiest thing to replace.

    • That Annoying Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I try to buy local fruit and veg only. Fun fact: if we all went vegan, we could free up 70-80% of the land currently being used for animal ag. We could rewild that land and still have excess food. We currently grow enough plants to feed 15B people, but we feed that to the animals instead.

      • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        We currently grow enough plants to feed 15B people, but we feed that to the animals instead.

        a lot of the plant matter fed to animals is parts of plants we can’t or won’t eat.

        and a lot of the land used isn’t crop land, but grazing land

        and they’re is no reason to believe the land would ever be rewilded.

        • lumpybag@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Even just replacing 25-50% meat with plants in the US would have incredible outcomes for the people. I guarantee we would be a far healthier population. The cheap meat being served up to Americans is not good.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Maybe this is bias from 20ish years of not eating meat, but most of the time it just smells foul to me, like an overly sour smell that only goes away if you spice the fuck out of it. Beef and chicken are the main offenders for this for me.

        • tree_frog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          It’s mostly corn.

          Granted, it’s not processed in a way to be fit for human consumption.

          But still, most of it is corn. Some of it is corn cobs and stalks but most of it is kernels.

          Outside of that, other grains are very common. Oats for example.

          So, they are right. Raising plants to feed animals so we can eat the animals is less efficient than raising plants for us to eat. Especially in regards to cattle. Which is one of the most inefficient things in the US food system. The only reason it’s so cheap is because of subsidation, both of the cattle and the corn that’s grown to feed them.

          And countries much larger than our own survive on rice and beans just fine. As queerminest eluded to in her comment.

          As far as local food, I have a co-op. So I buy local vegetables and fruits when I can.

          • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            it’s not mostly kernels. livestock are fed the entire plant, and the kernels are a slim minority of the weight.

            • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Weight matters not even a little compared to the caloric content. If cows got more calories out of corn stalks than corn kernels, then they wouldn’t even finish growing the corn and would just feed them stalks. The fact you have to grow a corn stalk that weighs hundreds of times more than the kernels doesn’t mean the kernels aren’t what the farmers are after for livestock feed purposes. The stalk just gets tossed in for efficiency’s sake because the cows can also digest it.

              • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                The stalk just gets tossed in for efficiency’s sake because the cows can also digest it.

                you literally don’t know anything about feeding cows. just stop.

              • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                . If cows got more calories out of corn stalks than corn kernels, then they wouldn’t even finish growing the corn and would just feed them stalks.

                I don’t think so. they may get more calories from silage, but they prefer the kernels, which would help the feed go down easier.

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  You’re accusing me of not knowing how cows are fed when you’re inventing a world where farmers spend extra time growing crops to make it taste nicer to cows. Be real.

          • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Raising plants to feed animals so we can eat the animals is less efficient than raising plants for us to eat.

            if that were the situation, you might be right. but since we actually feed livestock mostly crop seconds and byproducts, it’s actually a conservation of resources in a lot of situations, with minimal competition with human food sources

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My point is, you try to… I try to also, but in the dead of winter there’s no a local fruit and veggies. I’m also not vegan/vegetarian, I eat meat. Fish, and chicken primarily but I don’t raise either, so I have to rely on someone else to do that for me.

        We do actually get probably half our eggs from someone at my wife’s work, and some. fruits and vegetables at the farmers market down the street in the summer. But they’re closed now and have been most of winter.

        It’s harder than just saying “just stop” was my point. I’d love to be part of the solution where I can but there’s zero chance of me not eating meat if it’s available.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Vegan here. Sticking to the two questions you asked before you got lost in scope creep and logical fallacy: I get my food from the supermarket, mostly. And it scales way better than animal ag because farming plants requires radically less resources per calorie than farming animals.

      Just like most other positive decisions in the world, it’s not revolutionary on it’s own. Nor is it aiming to be, nor does it need to be.

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t disagree with your general sentiment, but what I see as responses here are often empty responses… Just the obvious “we should stop being terrible arbiters of our planet”. Like no shit, but it’s hard and MOST humans are not gonna ever be vegan/vegetarian unless forced.

        • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          What a strange thought. How would you define the driving factor behind any food consumption other than forced?

          • dmtalon@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I am 100% in that category. I have some aspirations to be in a lifestyle where I catch a lot of my own fish but zero desire to move off animal protein to a vegetarian lifestyle.