Everyone who didn’t vote got what they asked for

the only thing they clearly wanted was no winner

because out of two candidates, one is always better than another

if neither one should have power, I’m not voting for either one

Not voting is literally a declaration that you don’t care who governs you

no, it’s not

yes, I do

I shake my head at ballots cast for elephants

I shake my head at ballots cast for donkeys

cuz I swear to God our leaders

they will be the death of us

there is no vote we can cast to set us free

vote November second if it seems right to you

don’t vote if you think it just holds us down

but tell me what we’re gonna do on November third

to make sure there’s no government left to elect two years from now

“I want candy” by mc Chris?

or maybe something from the coup? like “magic clap” or “takin these” or “everythang” or “ride the fence”…

edit: oh fuck. I forgot “the man” by the killers

double edit: damn, reading the coup track list and I missed “we are the ones” and “5 million ways to kill a ceo”

triple edit: the stimulator put out a series of workout mixes called “burning cop car” that is full of winners in this category

the Lauren Mayberry one is so much more heartfelt

veganism opposes exploitation of animals.

if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I’m not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I’ve seen in months.

calling me names won’t change the facts.

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn’t actually support the claim that you’re using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don’t make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: “them” was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

no, I’m examining your position, and the evidence provided, and found that they are insufficient.

it shows that the evidence you’ve provided doesn’t actually support your claim

the only peer reviewed source you provided spends as much time detailing risks as it does explaining potential benefits, and it’s based on a single case study.

You’re on the block list now.

oh thank God.

calling me names doesn’t change the facts

this is more hypothesizing. it’s not proof of your claim.

your accusation of sealioning is also bad faith.

then make that case instead of claiming they’d fold someone.