• glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Damn you are right, this rbb (german funded media) article in german reports this in detail https://www.rbb24.de/panorama/beitrag/2025/01/tesla-gruenheide-led-by-donkeys-zentrum-fuer-politische-schoenheit-beamer-projektion-fassade.html

    German police started investigating the activists for showing “Verwendens von Kennzeichen verfassungswidriger Organisationen” (I will roughly translate this to “usage of unconstitutional symbols”) . Are they serious, like showing images of Musk doing this is unlawful?

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes. He is a nazi performing a nazi salute which is prohibited for good reasons. So that specific image where Elon basically comes clean as the Nazi he is, is in fact prohibited.

      I mean why shouldn’t this be unlawful?

      It is because he is a rich billionaire and they cannot be bad right? /s

      • glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        no I mean the activists “Zentrum für Politische Schönheit” who projected the image at the factory are investigated for a crime, for showing Musk doing the Hitler salute. Wat will be their punishment, this was not meant to put Musk into a good light, but rather his nature.

        • ansiz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          This is mostly to get the German police to investigate so they will say that it is actual a Nazi salute. Even if the protesters get into legal trouble that is the point, to get the German police to take a stance.

        • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Ah sorry for the misunderstanding. Yes it is. Even though it is satirical, it it still ‘wrong’ imagery. But a 10/10 message.

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well, they have to do it but it’s no declaration of guilt. Just like because someone is in front of a judge they’re not automatically guilty.