• dudeami0@lemmy.dudeami.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being proudly ignorant of everything is bad. I will respect people who know they don’t know things though, you can’t know everything about everything. It’s why people generally specialize in a field in an industry.

    • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sometimes my friends laugh at me for how little I know about pop culture. I laugh back though. I wouldn’t say I’m proud of it but it’s just funny.

    • mcc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some people can be very well educated but choose not to follow reason. For example polititions appealing to a voting base. Point is these things certainly say “what a twat” but doesn’t necessarily reflect poor education.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Coping mechanism for the poor, they can’t admit they’re at the bottom and so it feels good to put other people down for nonsense reasons

  • DePingus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thinking that someone without a formal education is somehow beneath you.

    • ram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the flipside, the belief that someone with a formal education is somehow beneath you or brainwashed for it.

  • SeverianWolf@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who litter. Throw their rubbish out the window of the car. Or who throw rubbish in public, like into drains or sidewalks.

    It’s in the mentality, and I say the lack of education is the reason for it.

    It’s sad to see the people of my country do this, and to see it with your own eyes.

  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not being able to entertain ideas. “What would the world be like with 100% renewable energy?” “Would basic healthcare for every person help our country?”

    I tried to explain the 4 day work week to someone that gets paid by the hour. You make the same money but work 4 days a week instead of 5. Insisted he got paid less. Had to explain like a Bingo card with a Free Space, 1 day he is paid even if he stays home.

    • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if that’s necessarily wrong of them. There isn’t any precedent for hourly workers to be paid when they’re not working. The “four day workweek” as described simply means that any time over 32 hours a week is overtime. Hourly workers in general don’t really have a “workweek” anyway because they will often have multiple jobs or will work whatever shift they can pick up that works with their schedule.

      They understood how the 4-day workweek works based on how the 5-day workweek works. I think maybe you need to listen more to them and try to understand your own proposition better.

      When companies voluntarily implement 4-day workweeks, they are literally either cutting 8 hours or doing 10-hour shifts. They do not pay for hours not worked.

    • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the idea of the 4 day workweek and would absolutely advocate for it, but I’m not sure how I personally would be affected by it. I do rotating 12 hour shift work to operate a power plant. I flip between 36 and 48 scheduled hours, 5 to 5 flipping between days and nights with a few days off between to flip my sleep schedule.

      Would my OT start after 32 hours instead of 40? Would my company hire more people to schedule me between 24 and 36 hour weeks as a result? Because I’m not sure they’d be down with paying 4 hours OT on the cheapest weeks of my labor, and 16 hours OT every other week. So they probably have me work less, but does this result in a one time 25% raise and then fall off over time as no further raises come?

      Idk, I would be fine either way because of how I budget, but I think these are valid questions that most hourly workers should be concerned about. I don’t think it’s such a simple concept, and companies will almost certainly find loopholes to exploit to fuck us like they did for the ACA.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because he’s an hourly worker he’s in the hourly mindset. You’d have to say your hourly rate would go up but only if you worked 32 hr/wk.

    • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s good to note that while some of this is a failure to develop critical thinking, failure to entertain hypotheticals is OFTEN a trait for people with differing cognition. So don’t assume they’re poorly educated just from this, take it as a sign that the person thinks differently.

      I’ve met and am friends with people who struggle with hypotheticals and education isn’t the problem, just how their brain works.

      • voxov7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, some hypotheticals don’t consider the inherent problem of a situation or ignores context, and therefor aren’t worth entertaining. Not all, just some. When that happens it’s best to explain why the hypothetical doesn’t work, which I suppose is entertaining it.

  • salarua@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    taking Ayn Rand’s work seriously. five seconds of critical thought and her entire philosophy comes crashing down

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that few people seem to accept when saying that they believe in Ayn Rand’s philosophy is that you are supposed to pay people what they are worth, not what you can negotiate with them.

      For instance, in Atlas Shrugged, it is made explicit that Rearden pays his mill workers far above typical salaries because it is worth it to him to have the best staff working in his mills. Rearden is also the kind of person who isn’t going to make racist or sexist jokes because he wants the best person regardless of sex or color.

      What Objectivist is that moral?

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s actually the root of all social philosophies: they require decent people.

        No matter which system you take, capitalism, communism, anarchism, monarchy, democracy, etc. they all would work perfectly fine, if people wouldn’t be stupid, selfish and about 1% downright psychopaths. And I’m not even talking about real crimes. In your example it would be perfectly legal, to pay the workers the absolute minimum possible, but it would be a dick move.

        At the end of the day, a system always has to answer the question: How do you reign in assholes? That’s it. Designing a system based on Jesuses is trivial.

        • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not enough to reign in assholes, the system has to be designed in such a way that carriers of “dark triad” traits (i.e. the usual bad faith actors in a system) are still incentivized to contribute to or improve society without gradually dismantling it to increase their wealth/power/status. That’s a hard problem to solve.

  • Joe_0237@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who think their dialect or language style is grammatically correct and others are wrong, because they don’t personally known the grammar rules of any other dialect or language. They don’t understand that language is alive and evolving and that the purpose of language is communication.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    MAGA Hats. Those people are dumb by choice. And that’s less forgivable than people who just don’t know any better.

  • squirrel_bear@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being poor or lower middle class and voting for right wing/conservatives. You essentially give away your hard earned money and give it to ultra rich and worsen the quality of your life… usually because the right wing scares people to be afraid of other people and new phenomena.

    • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “People who don’t support my party are stupid”

      Is a pretty big “poorly educated” sign.

  • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Associating with arbitrary groups, such as football fans, nationalists, wearing certain clothing brands