• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Not saying you are wrong about the marginalized, but in this case she made, what could be considered threatening, a call to a health care provider that was not only actionable, but entirely recorded.

    “The system” won’t make an example out of her, “Exhibit A” will. That’s the difference.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        In Trump’s case it would be on 5th avenue in broad daylight.

        Just a joke though.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s both.

      $100k bond for a threat that is neither specific nor credible is absurd.

      If it were a first time offender threat against a normal person (which is more specific), at most it would result in probation and a restraining order.