Billionaires emit more carbon pollution in 90 minutes than the average person does in a lifetime | Oxfam International
www.oxfam.org

“The super-rich are treating our planet like their personal playground, setting it ablaze for pleasure and profit. Their dirty investments and luxury toys —private jets and yachts— aren’t just symbols of excess; they’re a direct threat to people and the planet,” said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar.

  • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    152·
    2 months ago

    If she was a good billionaire, she wouldn’t have hoarded wealth to this degree! Yes, Bezos is 200x worse, but I would bet (less than $1B) that she will catch up in the next decade and we’ll all still be apologizing for her.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.worldEnglish
      181·
      2 months ago

      I ain’t apologizing for her now. My point is to work on the ones that are more easily hated by more people in order to raise awareness.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
        55·
        2 months ago

        I disagree, this flip-flop logic is what drags down the movement and allows “no billionaires except the ones I like” idea to poison the public discourse. If we collectively stick to a unified view we have much more power in changing things.

        • legion02@lemmy.worldEnglish
          132·
          2 months ago

          Yes let’s take the most wildly liked billionaire and make them our example. Surely that will convince people to join us.

          • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            21·
            2 months ago

            Personally, my goal is to challenge people to think critically about billionaires. Taylor Swift is a great example precisely because fans have put her on a pedestal where she can do no wrong. If the goal is to gather an angry mob, then sure, it’s more effective to focus on Bezos, the guy they already dislike.