• N3Cr0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    .Net sucks, compared to mono. The compiler is slower, filesize after optimization is still higher and the character set in cli is far more limited when I compile an app with .Net.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are those the most important factors for a framework? Or in the top 5?

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      … and execution speed is faster. And they’re both open source. I mean, good thing we have choices, right?

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Source? I’d like to see some modern numbers about those compile times. Hasn’t been my experience at all.

      • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s my personal experience. I would have to share my affected projects for a source, but I didn’t release them yet.

        Just try it by printing some special characters on the cli - like arrow symbols

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Unfortunately the license agreement for .Net forbids publishing any kind of benchmark results.