• unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They may be coming from somewhere other than Lemmy (Mastodon?) and this format is more acceptable and/or normalized for them. One of the quirks of the fediverse.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            2 months ago

            This is Lemmy, they oughta get right for Lemmy, as I should for whatever they got there.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It literally just works this way. There’s no way to post onto Lemmy from Mastodon without doing this as far as I know.

                • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t disagree, but telling individual commenters to do better isn’t going to work when the technology fundamentally doesn’t allow for it.

                  If you feel quite strongly about it, you could always open an issue with the Lemmy devs or the Mastodon devs.

                  Otherwise I feel like you’ll just come off as kind of a jerk?

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Meh so be it.

                If an instance or platform had a no swearing rule but our posts automatically injected swear words, they’d probably take issue with it. It’s just junk process.

                (Obviously no one cares about swearing that’s not the point, just an example.)

                @'ing people is weird and I’m fine being an old man about it

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh look, it took me all of a half second to skip over the @s and read the message! What inconvenience!

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Obviously that’s not the issue, it’s just poor etiquette

            • psud@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So complain to the developers that make mastodon work that way. Complaining here is worse than useless, no one here can do anything about it

                • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  or go away

                  One of the only true ‘responsibilities’ of Lemmy users is to conduct themselves in a manner that encourages user participation. This is not that and you are getting close to harrassement territory.

                  Drop it, and complain to the Lemmy/Mastodon devs.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does MFA stand for Mother Fucking Army?

    Translated to the lingo of the American south I think it might read something like:

    Oh, sweet summer child, bless your heart. Run along, now, and clean up your toys.

  • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not knowing how these things normally work I’d just kindof assumed it was generally polite if not outright agreed upon that one doesn’t leave weapons sitting pointed at one’s neighbours 🤔 🤷 Maybe I think too much of hunams 😅

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Usually (though there are some exceptions) with their permission. It’s usually to extend the range and decrease the response time of the US military, but it’s also to bolster allies. They also bring a lot of business to those areas as the deployed soldiers leave base frequently to live life. They aren’t hostile (to the host).

        • Taalen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not only with their permission. In many cases at the request of the host country. Plenty of countries would like to host a US base.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          In South Korea, the soldiers have a curfew imposed by the base and Korean government because of the high frequency of rape.

          My personal experience with soldiers in South Korea and Japan have been… Mostly negative. They are arrogant shitheads most of the time.

          All of that said, I understand that isn’t a US policy issue, more than a military culture issue.