This is the first I’ve heard of it, but here’s one of his infamous quotes:

"There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews.

I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”

His other quotes tend to be condemnation about specifically Israeli zionism and barbaric murder, but i don’t have context as to whether he’s referring to palestine or not. Some people might have more sympathy for these statements these days, but a lot of his other quotes have to do with Jews controlling money and media, less defensible prejudice.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    You specifically brought up Jewish genetic diversity in your previous comment:

    Yes, because it doesn’t take a Ph.D. in biophysics to see that there are slavic jews, caucasian jews and arab jews at the very least.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Of course not.

      I’m pointing out that you are trying to dismiss the article regarding Jewish genetic diversity by saying

      “Now, I am not a evolutionary biologist nor doctor, so instead of weighing in on a subject that I do not know about…”

      even though it has only become a topic because you have taken the initiative to weigh in on the topic in your previous comment.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In no way am I trying to dismiss the article by saying “I’m not weighing in on that”. Nevertheless, my core point remains unrelated: antisemitism should not be used interchangeably with racism. And by saying that, in no way am I trying to condone either.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I agree.

          I think you’re preaching to the choir here though, nobody has used either term incorrectly in these threads, as far as I’ve seen.

          Disambiguation might be more useful somewhere that the terms are being conflated.

          Defining terms is unrelated and unnecessaryto the topic here.

          Not inaccurate, perhaps unwarranted.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well - the discussion originated from my comment that the OP quoted something anti-semitic in a post whose title is about racism. I just thought it’s maybe not the most fitting example. But yeah, it doesn’t matter too much.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The post is about anti-Semitism, a specific form of cultural and ethnic racism against Jews and Israelis demonstrated in multiple quotes by Roald Dahl.

              Dahl attributes undesirable characteristics to several linked groups(Jews, Israelis, Zionists) and rationalizes the specifically ethnic Jewish genocide by Hitler.

              There are further quotes that you may be missing. Pretty much all of his racism and anti-Semitism is gathered here now, however you care to define each term.

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I was not arguing the point that the author had racist opinions / convictions. I was saying I expected there to certainly be a quote that was more fitting to the post title. Especially since as you confirm there are plenty of quotes. Anyways, I came to the post to inform myself - I have heard the name, but the works of this author are not among those books I have read.

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  The referenced OP quote Dahl makes rationalizing the Holocaust, a specifically ethnic genocide, doesn’t strike you as racist?

                  How are you defining racism if not as prejudice against a specific race?

                  Also

                  “But yeah, it doesn’t matter too much.”

                  You’ve mentioned this a couple times, but each sentiment is contradicted by a dozen of your own comments belying your ardent passion for splitting the hairs of bigotry from racism for an as of yet unclear reason.

                  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    The referenced OP quote Dahl makes rationalizing the Holocaust, a specifically ethnic genocide, doesn’t strike you as racist?

                    That context is not part of the quote though. As a matter of fact, unless you started mentioning it, and specifically with a jewish perspective on this author in this very thread, I wasn’t aware that he was also rationalizing the holocaust.

                    How are you defining racism if not as prejudice against a specific race?

                    I am bewildered how you and some others keep misquoting me this badly. I thought we had already agreed on the bottom line? I’ll sign out of this discussion here, there was nothing to be gained beyond a fruitful exchange, and that is no longer to be gained.